nach oben

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Erschienen in:

02.08.2023 | Knee Arthroplasty

Medial tibial bone resorption following total knee arthroplasty comparing a traditional with a kinematic design

verfasst von: Mukesh Kumar Saini, Challa Dinesh Reddy, Neelam Ramana Reddy, Pera Jayavardhan Reddy, Mahendra Singh, Mahesh Bhati

Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Ausgabe 12/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

New total knee prostheses are being designed to improve clinical outcome, survivorship and patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A new knee system was developed with improvements in patellofemoral joint, trochlear geometry, polyethylene formulation and tibial baseplate. Aim of this study was to compare the newer kinematic knee system with its existing predecessor knee system in terms of clinical outcome, revision rates, radiographic outcomes specifically medial tibial bone resorption.

Methods

The prospective matched-pair study included 88 TKA surgeries using newer kinematic design knee prostheses, performed between January 2015 and December 2016, out of which 82 patients were available for final follow-up. The control cohort of 82 traditional TKA prosthesis was matched in terms of age, gender and body mass index. All surgeries were performed by the single surgeon using medial parapatellar arthrotomy and posterior stabilized implants were used. Clinical outcomes were assessed using knee society score, range of motion (ROM), anterior knee pain and crepitation. Radiological examinations included recording of radiolucent lines and medial tibial bone resorption.

Results

At the 5-year follow-up, no significant differences were noted in terms of mean knee society score (93.3 ± 6.6 vs 94.2 ± 8.1), knee function score (88.5 ± 10.5 vs 89.1 ± 11.2) and ROM. The incidences of anterior knee pain and crepitation were lower in the newer group (8.5% vs 21.9% and 14.6% vs 32.9%, respectively) compared to the traditional prosthesis group. No cases of aseptic loosening were observed in either cohort. No significant difference was seen in terms of radiolucent lines (29.3% vs 26.8%) and medial tibial resorption (2.43% in each group) incidences.

Conclusions

At the 5 years follow-up no significant differences were noted between the two groups in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes, except the former proved to be better for anterior knee pain and crepitation.

Level of evidence

II.

Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ, National Joint Registry for England and Wales (2007) The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89(7):893–900. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.19091CrossRef

Scott CE, Howie CR, MacDonald D, Biant LC (2010) Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Jt Surg Br 92(9):1253–1258. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.24394CrossRef

Nam D, Nunley RM, Barrack RL (2014) Patient dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a growing concern? Bone Jt J 96-B(11 Supple A):96–100. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34152CrossRef

Maniar RN, Bhatnagar N, Bidwai R, Dhiman A, Chanda D, Sanghavi N (2022) Comparison of patellofemoral outcomes between Attune and PFC Sigma designs: a prospective matched-pair analysis. Clin Orthop Surg 14(1):96–104. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios20130CrossRefPubMed

Ranawat CS, White PB, West S, Ranawat AS (2017) Clinical and radiographic results of Attune and PFC Sigma knee designs at 2-year follow-up: a prospective matched-pair analysis. J Arthroplast 32(2):431–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.021CrossRef

Song SJ, Kang SG, Park CH, Bae DK (2018) Comparison of clinical results and risk of patellar injury between Attune and PFC Sigma knee systems. Knee Surg Relat Res 30(4):334–340. https://doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.18.020CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cerquiglini A, Henckel J, Hothi H et al (2019) Analysis of the Attune tibial tray backside: a comparative retrieval study. Bone Jt Res 8(3):136–145. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.83.BJJ-2018-0102.R2CrossRef

Martin JR, Jennings JM, Watters TS, Levy DL, McNabb DC, Dennis DA (2017) Femoral implant design modification decreases the incidence of patellar crepitus in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 32(4):1310–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.025CrossRef

Panchani SK, Divecha HM, Lafferty R et al (2021) Early functional outcomes after evolutionary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Is new always better? JB JS Open Access 6(3):e21.00016. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00016CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Carey BW, Harty J (2018) A comparison of clinical- and patient-reported outcomes of the cemented ATTUNE and PFC sigma fixed bearing cruciate sacrificing knee systems in patients who underwent total knee replacement with both prostheses in opposite knees. J Orthop Surg Res 13(1):54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0757-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Bonutti PM, Khlopas A, Chughtai M et al (2017) Unusually high rate of early failure of tibial component in ATTUNE total knee arthroplasty system at implant-cement interface. J Knee Surg 30(5):435–439. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603756CrossRefPubMed

12.

Murphy JD, Braunlich PR, Judson Iv WR, Harker JN, Baumann PA (2021) Early aseptic failure of the tibial component-cement interface in ATTUNE^® total knee arthroplasty: a report of three cases. Cureus 13(12):e20582. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20582CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Martin JR, Watts CD, Levy DL, Kim RH (2017) Medial tibial stress shielding: a limitation of cobalt chromium tibial baseplates. J Arthroplast 32(2):558–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.027CrossRef

14.

Yoon C, Chang MJ, Chang CB, Song MK, Shin JH, Kang SB (2018) Medial tibial periprosthetic bone resorption and its effect on clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: cobalt-chromium vs titanium implants. J Arthroplast 33(9):2835–2842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.025CrossRef

15.

Martin JR, Watts CD, Levy DL, Miner TM, Springer BD, Kim RH (2017) Tibial tray thickness significantly increases medial tibial bone resorption in cobalt-chromium total knee arthroplasty implants. J Arthroplast 32(1):79–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.007CrossRef

16.

Deen JT, Clay TB, Iams DA, Horodyski M, Parvataneni HK (2017) Proximal tibial resorption in a modern total knee prosthesis. Arthroplast Today 4(2):244–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2017.10.005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Willy RW, Hoglund LT, Barton CJ et al (2019) Patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 49(9):CPG1–CPG95. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2019.0302CrossRefPubMed

18.

Ewald FC (1989) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12CrossRef

19.

Nakahara H, Okazaki K, Mizu-Uchi H et al (2015) Correlations between patient satisfaction and ability to perform daily activities after total knee arthroplasty: why aren’t patients satisfied? J Orthop Sci 20(1):87–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0671-7CrossRefPubMed

20.

Robinson T, King SW, Pilling RWD et al (2021) Attune total knee arthroplasty: is there evidence of early tibial component de-bonding? A prospective cohort study with a minimum two year follow-up. J Arthrosc Jt Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jajs.2021.03.007CrossRef

21.

Sires J, Lennon S, Inglis M, Nguyen A, Wilson C (2020) Early results of the Attune knee system: a minimum 2 year follow up observational study. Open Access J Biomed Sci 2(4):494–498. https://doi.org/10.38125/OAJBS.000201CrossRef

22.

Bateman DK, Preston JS, Mennona S, Gui E, Kayiaros S (2020) Comparison between the Attune and PFC Sigma in total knee arthroplasty: no difference in patellar clunk and crepitus or anterior knee pain. Orthopedics 43(6):e508–e514. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20200812-05CrossRefPubMed

23.

Wong DW, Lee QJ, Lo CK, Wong YC, Law KW, Li AH (2020) Tibial tray thickness does not significantly increase medial tibial bone resorption: using tibial bone density as an objective measurement method. Knee 27(2):572–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.12.011CrossRefPubMed

24.

Shichman I, Oakley CT, Thomas J, Fernandez-Madrid I, Meftah M, Schwarzkopf R (2023) Comparison of traditional PS versus kinematically designs in primary total knee arthroplasty [published online ahead of print, 2023 Jan 10]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04763-8

25.

Choudhury AK, Gupta K, Ansari S, Raja BS, Paul S, Kalia RB (2023) Modern implants in total knee arthroplasty are more patellofemoral joint friendly compared to their traditional design: a systematic review and meta-analysis [published online ahead of print, 2023 Mar 24]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04832-y

26.

Vanitcharoenkul E, Unnanuntana A (2021) Midterm functional recovery of total knee arthroplasty patients compared between the ATTUNE knee system and the press fit condylar (PFC) SIGMA knee system. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22(1):620. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04464-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Medial tibial bone resorption following total knee arthroplasty comparing a traditional with a kinematic design
verfasst von: Mukesh Kumar Saini
Challa Dinesh Reddy
Neelam Ramana Reddy
Pera Jayavardhan Reddy
Mahendra Singh
Mahesh Bhati
Publikationsdatum: 02.08.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Ausgabe 12/2023
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-05000-y

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

29.05.2024 Periprothetische Infektionen Nachrichten

Zur Zementierung einer Knie-TEP wird in Deutschland zu über 98% Knochenzement verwendet, der mit einem Antibiotikum beladen ist. Ob er wirklich besser ist als Zement ohne Antibiotikum, kann laut Registerdaten bezweifelt werden.

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Medial tibial bone resorption following total knee arthroplasty comparing a traditional with a kinematic design