From the hundreds of biomarkers evaluated for diagnosing infection and sepsis, only a handful are used by clinicians on a large scale. Although non-specific for the diagnosis of sepsis, CRP and procalcitonin (PCT) are often used to detect inflammaion because of their high sensitivity [
16]. CRP is an acute-phase reactant protein synthesized by the liver, primarily induced by IL-6 [
17], whereas PCT is a precursor for the calcitonin hormone, normally made in the thyroid gland. When compared to CRP, PCT levels increase faster after stimulation, reach their peak faster, and also decline faster after resolution of infection [
18]. These are desirable characteristics for a biomarker, especially in the ER, as they describe the current state of a patient more accurately. A systematic review, which assessed the accuracy and clinical value of PCT for diagnosis of sepsis in intensive care unit (ICU) and ER patients, reported an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.85 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81–0.88) for diagnosis of sepsis [
19]. One of the included studies, among ER patients with suspected infection, reported an AUC value for PCT of 0.79 for diagnosis of sepsis, which was better than that of IL-6 (AUC 0.70) or CRP (AUC 0.67) [
20]. This finding was confirmed in a recent systematic review that specifically addressed the role of PCT in the ER setting [
21]; according to most included studies, PCT performed better than CRP or lactate as a diagnostic biomarker for sepsis. As a predictor of adverse outcomes, the data on PCT are more inconsistent. In some studies PCT was superior to CRP and lactate, but in others it was not [
21]. There is, however, solid evidence that PCT can be of added value for effectively and safely reducing the duration of antibiotic therapy in critically ill patients. This is underlined by a recent meta-analysis that included studies in patients with sepsis and/or respiratory infection, demonstrating that duration of antibiotic treatment was significantly reduced in both groups when PCT was used as a guiding biomarker compared with clinical evaluation alone [
18]; as a secondary outcome, in-hospital mortality was also significantly lower among these patients [
18]. Currently, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines advise against using PCT to aid the decision of when to start antimicrobials and suggest clinical evaluation alone [
3].