Erschienen in:
06.08.2023 | Trauma Surgery
Total hip arthroplasty in acute acetabulum fractures: a systematic review
verfasst von:
Hadis Darvishi Nakhl Ebrahimi, Chia H. Wu, Daniel Karczewski, Dominik Adl Amini, Michael Dahne, Henrik C. Bäcker
Erschienen in:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
|
Ausgabe 11/2023
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Introduction
The incidence of acetabular fractures has increased significantly in recent years due to demographic change. It can be divided into high-energy acetabular fractures primarily seen in adult patients versus geriatric patients mostly suffering from low-energy trauma. Historically, acetabular fractures have been treated either non-operatively or surgically following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), whereas nowadays total hip arthroplasty (THA) provides a true alternative. Aim of this study was to perform a systematic review on the outcome following THA in acute acetabulum fractures.
Methods
PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane and Google databases were systematically searched on December 9, 2021. The key terms were [acetabular fracture] AND [[arthroplasty] OR [fixation]]. All retrospective and prospective original studies in English and German were analyzed the outcome following THA in acute acetabulum fractures were included.
Results
A total of 2459 studies were screened, which includes 15 studies that met the inclusion criteria with a total of 590 patients at a mean age of 61.3 years (SD 11.48). Most studies described good to excellent results. Especially, THA allows elderly patients quicker mobilization and rehabilitation as well as symptomatic relief, as compared to ORIF or non-operative treatment. Patients who underwent non-operative treatment showed better results compared to those who underwent ORIF initially.
Conclusion
In acetabulum fractures, THA provides a good alternative with very good results when patients are carefully selected. Good to excellent outcomes are reported for both acute and delayed use of THA in elderly patients.
Level of evidence
Level 2, systematic review.