nach oben

Erschienen in:

24.07.2023 | Research

The solubility, pH value, chemical structure, radiopacity, and cytotoxicity of four different root canal sealers: an in vitro study

verfasst von: Gözde Kandemir Demirci, Furkan Ozan Çöven, Pelin Güneri, Sinem Yaprak Karavana, Ayşe Nalbantsoy, Timur Köse, Mehmet Emin Kaval

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 9/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate solubility, pH value, chemical structure, radiopacity, and cytotoxicity of AH Plus BC, TotalFill BC, AH Plus, and AH Plus Jet sealers.

Materials and methods

Cytotoxicity analysis with direct and extraction tests at 3 different concentrations (1:1, 1:2, 1:4 v/v%) and time (24 h, 48 h, and 72 h) on Saos-2, PdLF, and THP-1 cell lines, chemical structure with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis, solubility, pH, and radiopacity values of AH Plus BC, TotalFill BC, AH Plus, and AH Plus Jet were evaluated. For statistical analyses of the groups, repeated measures, factorial, and one-way ANOVA tests were used. The statistical significance level was set at p < .05.

Results

Resin-based sealers showed higher cytotoxicity values than the bioceramic-based sealers (p < 0.05). Time and concentrations were effective on the cell viabilities for cell lines. Higher peaks of calcium were detected bioceramic-based sealers and higher amount of zirconium was detected in AH Plus BC (p < 0.05). AH Plus BC showed similar radiopacity value with AH Plus, AH Plus Jet, whereas TotalFill BC showed the lowest radiopacity (p < 0.05). Bioceramic-based sealers had higher pH values in all experiment periods, and the difference between resin- and bioceramic-based sealer groups was significant (p < 0.05). However, the solubility values of the tested root canal sealers revealed no differences (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The newly produced AH Plus BC Sealer showed similar properties with TotalFill BC, and their biological properties were better than AH Plus and AH Plus Jet.

Clinical relevance

AH Plus BC could be a possible alternative to other bioceramic- or resin-based sealers.

Mann A, Zeng Y, Kirkpatrick T et al (2022) Evaluation of the physicochemical and biological properties of EndoSequence BC Sealer HiFlow. J Endod 48:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2021.10.001CrossRefPubMed

Al-Haddad AY, Kutty MG, Abu Kasim NH, Che Ab Aziz ZA (2017) The effect of moisture conditions on the constitution of two bioceramic-based root canal sealers. J Dent Sci 12:340–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2017.03.008CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rodriguez-Lozano FJ, Garcia-Bernal D, Onate-Sanchez RE, Ortolani-Seltenerich PS, Forner L, Moraleda JM (2017) Evaluation of cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers and their effects on the biological responses of mesenchymal dental stem cells. Int Endod J 50:67–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12596CrossRefPubMed

Koch KA, Brave DG (2012) Bioceramics, part I: the clinician’s viewpoint. Dent Today 31:130–135PubMed

Prati C, Gandolfi MG (2015) Calcium silicate bioactive cements: biological perspectives and clinical applications. Dent Mater 31:351–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.004CrossRefPubMed

Baldi JV, Bernardes RA, Duarte MA et al (2012) Variability of physicochemical properties of an epoxy resin sealer taken from different parts of the same tube. Int Endod J 45:915–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02049.xCrossRefPubMed

De-Deus G, Scelza MZ, Neelakantan P et al (2015) Three-dimensional quantitative porosity characterization of syringe-versus hand-mixed set epoxy resin root canal sealer. Braz Dent J 26:607–611. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201300074CrossRefPubMed

Donnermeyer D, Bürklein S, Dammaschke T, Schafer E (2018) Endodontic sealers based on calcium silicates: a systematic review. Odontology 107:421–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12662CrossRefPubMed

Carvalho NK, Prado MC, Senna PM et al (2017) Do smear-layer removal agents affect the push-out bond strength of calcium-silicate based endodontic sealers? Int Endod J 50:612–619CrossRefPubMed

10.

Gokturk H, Bayram E, Bayram HM, Aslan T, Ustun Y (2017) Effect of double antibiotic and calcium hydroxide pastes on dislodgement resistance of an epoxy resin-based and two calcium silicate-based root canal sealers. Clin Oral Investig 21:1277–1282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1877-1CrossRefPubMed

11.

Chaves de Souza L, Teixeira Neves GS, Kirkpatrick T, Letra A, Silva R (2022) Physico-chemical and biological properties of AH Plus Bioceramic. J Endod 22:00715–00714. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2022.10.009CrossRef

12.

Sanz JL, López-García S, Rodríguez-Lozano FJ et al (2022) Cytocompatibility and bioactive potential of AH Plus Bioceramic sealer: an in vitro study. Int Endod J 55:1066–1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13805CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Kandemir Demirci G, Kaval ME, Kurt SM et al (2021) Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry analysis and radiopacity of five different root canal sealers. Braz Dent J 32:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202104638CrossRef

14.

International Organization for Standardization (ISO 10993-5) (2009) Biological evaluation of medical devices -Part 5: tests for in vitro cytotoxicity.

15.

Mosmann T (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65:55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4CrossRefPubMed

16.

Koulaouzidou EA, Roussou K, Sidiropoulos K et al (2018) Investigation of the chemical profile and cytotoxicity evaluation of organic components eluted from pit and fissure sealants. Food Chem Toxicol 120:536–543CrossRefPubMed

17.

Böke Sarıkahya N, Gören AC, Sümer Okkalı G, Çöven FO, Orman B, Kırcı D, Yücel B, Kışla D, Demirci B, Altun M, Önem AN, Nalbantsoy A (2021) Chemical composition and biological activities of propolis samples from different geographical regions of Turkey. Phytochem Lett 44:129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytol.2021.06.008CrossRef

18.

Souza LC, Yadlapati M, Dorn SO, Silva R, Letra A (2015) Analysis of radiopacity, pH and cytotoxicity of a new bioceramic material. J Appl Oral Sci 23:383–389. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720150065CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Tanomaru-Filho M, Torres FFE, Chávez-Andrade GM et al (2017) Physicochemical properties and volumetric change of silicone/bioactive glass and calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers. J Endod 43:2097–2101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.07.005CrossRefPubMed

20.

International Organization for Standardization (ISO 6876) (2012) Dental root canal sealing materials. Switzerland, Geneva

21.

Aminoshariae A, Kulild JC (2020) The impact of sealer extrusion on endodontic outcome: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Aust Endod J 46:123–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12370CrossRefPubMed

22.

Poggio C, Arciola CR, Beltrami R et al (2014) Cytocompatibility and antibacterial properties of capping materials. ScientificWorldJournal 2014:181945. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/181945CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Ferreira GC, Pinheiro LS, Nunes JS et al (2022) Evaluation of the biological and physicochemical properties of calcium silicate-based and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 110:1344–1353. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.35004CrossRefPubMed

24.

Peters OA (2013) Research that matters-biocompatibility and cytotoxicity screening. Int Endod J 46:195–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12047CrossRefPubMed

25.

Sanz JL, Guerrero-Gironés J, Pecci-Lloret MP et al (2021) Biological interactions between calcium silicate-based endodontic biomaterials and periodontal ligament stem cells: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Int Endod J 54:2025–2043. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13600CrossRefPubMed

26.

Willershausen I, Wolf T, Kasaj A, Weyer V, Willershausen B, Marroquin BB (2013) Influence of a bioceramic root end material and mineral trioxide aggregates on fibroblasts and osteoblasts. Arch Oral Biol 58:1232–1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.04.002CrossRefPubMed

27.

Bortoluzzi EA, Niu LN, Palani CD et al (2015) Cytotoxicity and osteogenic potential of silicate calcium cements as potential protective materials for pulpal revascularization. Dent Mater 31:1510–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.020CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Zordan-Bronzel CL, Tanomaru-Filho M, Rodrigues EM et al (2019) Cytocompatibility, bioactive potential and antimicrobial activity of an experimental calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer. Int Endod J 52:979–986. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13086CrossRefPubMed

29.

Pissiotis E, Spangberg LS (1991) Toxicity of Pulpispad using four different cell types. Int Endod J 24:249–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1991.tb01150.xCrossRefPubMed

30.

Correa GT, Veranio GA, Silva LE, Hirata Junior R, Coil JM, Scelza MF (2009) Cytotoxicity evaluation of two root canal sealers and a commercial calcium hydroxide paste on THP1 cell line by Trypan Blue assay. J Appl Oral Sci 17:457–461. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572009000500020CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Willershausen I, Callaway A, Briseno B, Willershausen B (2011) In vitro analysis of the cytotoxicity and the antimicrobial effect of four endodontic sealers. Head Face Med 7:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-7-15CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Kapellos TS, Bonaguro L, Gemünd I, Reusch N, Saglam A, Hinkley ER, Schultze JL (2019) Human monocyte subsets and phenotypes in major chronic ınflammatory diseases. Front Immunol 10:2035. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02035CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Wang L, Zhu L, Duan C, Li L, Chen G (2020) Total saponin of Dioscorea collettii attenuates MSU crystal-induced inflammation via inhibiting the activation of the NALP3 inflammasome and caspase-1 in THP-1 macrophages. Mol Med Rep 21:2466–2474. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11035CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Marchesan JT, Scanlon CS, Soehren S, Matsuo M, Kapila YL (2011) Implications of cultured periodontal ligament cells for the clinical and experimental setting: a review. Arch Oral Biol 56:933–943CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Huang FM, Chang YC (2002) Cytotoxicity of resin-based restorative materials on human pulp cell cultures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 94:361–365CrossRefPubMed

36.

Silva EJ, Accorsi-Mendonça T, Pedrosa AC, Granjeiro JM, Zaia AA (2016) Long-term cytotoxicity, pH and dissolution rate of AH plus and MTA fillapex. Braz Dent J 27:419–423. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201600735CrossRefPubMed

37.

Zhu Q, Haglund R, Safavi KE, Spangberg LS (2000) Adhesion of human osteoblasts on root-end filling materials. J Endod 26:404–406CrossRefPubMed

38.

De-Deus G, Canabarro A, Alves GG, Marins JR, Linhares AB, Granjeiro JM (2012) Cytocompatibility of the ready-to-use bioceramic putty repair cement iRoot BP Plus with primary human osteoblasts. Int Endod J 45:508–513CrossRefPubMed

39.

Rodan SB, Imai Y, Thiede MA et al (1987) Characterization of a human osteosarcoma cell line (Saos-2) with osteoblastic properties. Cancer Res 47:4961–4966PubMed

40.

Pautke C, Schieker M, Tischer T et al (2004) Characterization of osteosarcoma cell lines MG-63, Saos-2 and U-2 OS in comparison to human osteoblasts. Anticancer Res 24:3743–3748PubMed

41.

Granchi D, Stea S, Ciapetti G, Cavedagna D, Stea S, Pizzoferrato A (1995) Endodontic cements induce alterations in the cell cycle of in vitro cultured osteoblasts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 79:359–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(05)80230-6CrossRefPubMed

42.

Kangarloo A, Sattari M, Rabiee F, Dianat SO (2009) Evaluation of cytotoxicity of different root canal sealers and their effect on cytokine production. Iran Endod J 4:31–34PubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Li W, Zhou J, Xu Y (2015) Study of the in vitro cytotoxicity testing of medical devices. Biomed Rep. 3:617–620. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2015.481CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Candeiro GTM, Moura-Netto C, D'Almeida-Couto RS et al (2016) Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and antibacterial effectiveness of a bioceramic endodontic sealer. Int Endod J 49:858–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12523CrossRefPubMed

45.

Srivastava GK, Alonso-Alonso ML, Fernandez-Bueno I, Garcia-Gutierrez MT, Rull F, Medina J, Coco RM, Pastor JC (2018) Comparison between direct contact and extract exposure methods for PFO cytotoxicity evaluation. Sci Rep 23(8):1425. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19428-5CrossRef

46.

Loushine BA, Bryan TE, Looney SW et al (2011) Setting properties and cytotoxicity evaluation of a premixed bioceramic root canal sealer. J Endod 37:673–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.01.003CrossRefPubMed

47.

Zhang W, Li Z, Peng B (2010) Effects of iRoot SP on mineralization-related genes expression in MG63 cells. J Endod 36:1978–1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.038CrossRefPubMed

48.

Sari S, Duruturk L (2007) Radiographic evaluation of periapical healing of permanent teeth with periapical lesions after extrusion of AH Plus sealer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104:54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.03.024CrossRef

49.

Teixeira L, Basso FG, Hebling J et al (2017) Cytotoxicity evaluation of root canal sealers using an in vitro experimental model with roots. Braz Dent J 28:165–171. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201701430CrossRefPubMed

50.

Oh H, Kim E, Lee S et al (2020) Comparison of biocompatibility of calcium silicate-based sealers and epoxy resin-based sealer on human periodontal ligament stem cells. Materials 20:5242. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13225242CrossRef

51.

Campi LB, Torres FFE, Rodrigues EM, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru-Filho M (2022) Physicochemical and biological properties of new tricalcium silicate-based repair material doped with fluoride ions and zirconium oxide as radiopacifier. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 110:862–870CrossRefPubMed

52.

Queiroz MB, Torres FFE, Rodrigues EM, Viola KS, Bosso Martelo R, Chavez-Andrade GM et al (2021a) Development and evaluation of reparative tricalcium silicate-ZrO2-Biosilicate composites. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 109:468–476CrossRefPubMed

53.

Queiroz MB, Torres FFE, Rodrigues EM, Viola KS, Bosso Martelo R, Chavez-Andrade GM et al (2021b) Physicochemical, biological, and antibacterial evaluation of tricalcium silicate-based reparative cements with different radiopacifiers. Dent Mater 37:311–320CrossRefPubMed

54.

Zhou HM, Shen Y, Zheng W, Li L, Zheng YF, Haapasalo M (2013) Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers. J Endod 39:1281–1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.012CrossRefPubMed

55.

Lee JK, Kwak SW, Ha JH, Lee W, Kim HC (2017) Physicochemical properties of epoxy resin-based and bioceramic-based root canal sealers. Bioinorg Chem Appl:2582849. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2582849

56.

Primus CM, Tay FR, Niu LN (2019) Bioactive tri/dicalcium silicate cements for treatment of pulpal and periapical tissues. Acta Biomater 96:35–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.050CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

57.

Al-Haddad A, Che Ab Aziz ZA (2016) Bioceramic- based root canal sealers: a review. Int J Biomater 2016:9753210. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9753210CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Carvalho-Junior JR, Correr-Sobrinho L, Correr AB, Sinhoreti MA, Consani S, Sousa-Neto MD (2007) Radiopacity of root filling materials using digital radiography. Int Endod J 40:514–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01246.xCrossRefPubMed

59.

Touchefeu Y, Franken P, Harrington KJ (2012) Radiovirotherapy: principles and prospects in oncology. Curr Pharm Des 18:3313–3320. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612811209023313CrossRefPubMed

60.

Walsh RM, He J, Schweitzer J, Opperman LA, Woodmansey KF (2018) Bioactive endodontic materials for everyday use: a review. Gen Dent 66:48–51PubMed

Titel: The solubility, pH value, chemical structure, radiopacity, and cytotoxicity of four different root canal sealers: an in vitro study
verfasst von: Gözde Kandemir Demirci
Furkan Ozan Çöven
Pelin Güneri
Sinem Yaprak Karavana
Ayşe Nalbantsoy
Timur Köse
Mehmet Emin Kaval
Publikationsdatum: 24.07.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 9/2023
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05160-6

Update Zahnmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

The solubility, pH value, chemical structure, radiopacity, and cytotoxicity of four different root canal sealers: an in vitro study