Introduction
Methods
Evidence and recommendations
Question 1: in patients with suspected XY gonadal dysgenesis, what diagnostic testing should be considered to establish the diagnosis?
Evidence
Complete (pure) XY gonadal dysgenesis (XY CGD)
Recommendations
Evidence quality: low
Partial XY gonadal dysgenesis (PGD)
Recommendations
Evidence quality: low
Question 2: which patients with XY gonadal dysgenesis require gonadectomy, and what is the appropriate timing?
Evidence
Study | Type of study | Diagnoses | Location of gonads that show malignancy: if specified | Conclusions from each study regarding timing of gonadectomy | Design limitations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wunsch, et al. 2012 [33] | Observational Cohort study | 8 patients with CGD underwent gonadectomy: | All patients with CGD had intra-abdominal gonads | Early gonadectomy for patients with CGD | Small sample size, lack of blinding, lack of allocation concealment |
-Ages ranged from 1–25 years | All patients with PGD had intra-abdominal streak gonads. | For patients with PGD and non-scrotal gonads, early gonadectomy may be warranted | |||
-3 patients (37.5%) had evidence of in situ neoplasia (ages 3, 12, 18); | |||||
-2 of these patients also had dysgerminoma. 12 patients with PGD had gonadal tissue evaluation: | |||||
1 patient (8.3%) had gonadoblastoma at age 6 | |||||
Johansen, et al. 2012 [34] | Observational Retrospective study | 15 patients with PGD (45X/46,XY and variants) had gonadal samples for review: | 14 year old male had left inguinal dysgenetic testis with CIS | No specific recommendations for timing, does indicate that CIS originates before puberty | Small sample size, lack of blinding, lack of allocation concealment, ascertainment bias |
-3 patients (20%) had evidence of In situ Neoplasia: | 2 year old male with right inguinal dysgenetic testis | ||||
4 year old female with left inguinal dysgenetic testis | |||||
-2 males (ages 2 and 14) and 1 female (age 4) had CIS | |||||
Martinerie, et al. 2012 [35] | Observational Retrospective Study | 20 boys with PGD (45,X/46,XY) were studied | 13 year old with intra-abdominal streak gonad | No specific recommendations for timing of gonadectomy. | Small sample size, lack of blinding, lack of allocation concealment |
-2 patients (10%) had evidence of malignancy: | 23 year old with intrascrotal dysgenetic testis (inguinal at birth with orchidopexy at 9 years of age). | Recommend strict surveillance of gonads and testicular function in patients with PGD raised as males | |||
Dysgerminoma found in a 13 year old male. | |||||
Seminoma found in a 23 year old male. | |||||
Rocha, et al. 2011[20] | Observational Retrospective study | 9 patients with XY CGD who had histology available. | Abdominal | Recommend gonadectomy at diagnosis | Limited sample size, lack of blinding, lack of allocation concealment |
-Gonadoblastoma in 4 patients (44%) ages 14–17, Two of which also had dysgerminoma (22%) | |||||
Cools, et al. 2011[36] | Observational study | Obtained 84 gonadal samples from 39 patients with PGD who were 45,X/46, XY: | 1 patient with mild undervirilization had right abdominal gonad with gonadoblastoma (age not specified) | In females with PGD, tumor risk is limited but gonads are not functional, making gonadectomy the most reasonable option. | Small sample size, lack of blinding, lack of allocation concealment, selection bias (no gonadal tissue from undiagnosed 45,X/46,XY males). |
-In Situ Neoplasia found in 4 different patients (10.2%). | 1 patient with ambiguous phenotype had left abdominal gonad with gonadoblastoma (age 1) | Malignancy risk in males appears inversely related to degree of virilization (more virilized, less risk). | |||
-3 patients had gonadoblastoma, 1 had CIS. | 1 patient with ambiguous phenotype had dysgenetic inguinal testis with gonadoblastoma (age 1) | Low threshold for gonadectomy in males with ambiguous genitalia. | |||
1 patient with female phenotype had right abdominal gonad with CIS (age 16) | For mildly undervirilized males: 1 prepubertal biopsy and 1 post-pubertal biopsy | ||||
Michala, et al. 2008 [37] | Observational Retrospective study | Gonadal histology reviewed in 22 patients with Swyer syndrome: | Abdominal | Recommend bilateral gonadectomy as soon as diagnosis is made | Limited sample size, retrospective study |
-45% with germ cell tumors; | |||||
-32% with dysgerminoma (ages 10–31 years) | |||||
-14% with gonadoblastoma (ages 17, 19, and 27 yrs) | |||||
Cools, et al. 2006 [14] | Observational Retrospective Study | 60 gonadectomy samples from 43 patients with gonadal dysgenesis (included CGD and PGD): | Did not specify gonadal location | Gonadal histology revealing undifferentiated gonadal tissue or testicular tissue staining positive for OCT3/4 on the basal lamina contains high risk for gonadal tumors and should lead to immediate gonadectomy. | Small sample size, lack of blinding, lack of allocation concealment |
-35% incidence of germ cell tumors in patients with GD (n = 16), ages ranging from 4 months-25 yrs). | Testicular tissue displaying maturation delay of germ cells can be left in situ, given that its localization allows for adequate follow-up. | ||||
-All but 1 patient with malignancy had Y chromosome material. | Ovarian tissue can be safely left in place | ||||
-Invasive germ cell tumors found in 13% (n = 6) | Streak is not functional, making its preservation controversial | ||||
Mazzanti, et al. 2005 [38] | Observational Study | Identified 14 Turner patients with Y-chromosome material: | Abdominal | Recommend bilateral gonadectomy for all Turner patients with Y chromosome material | Limited sample size, lack of blinding, lack of allocation concealment. |
-12 out of 14 patients consented to gonadectomy: | |||||
33% of gonadectomized patients had gonadoblastoma (ages 2,7,11, 15 yrs) | |||||
The 15 year-old patient also had a immature teratoma, and a endodermal sinus tumor | |||||
Slowikowska-Hilczer, et al. 2003 [39] | Observational Study | Gonadal histology reviewed in 40 cases of gonadal dysgenesis: | All gonads were located in the abdomen or upper segment of the inguinal canal | No specific recommendations for timing of gonadectomy | Limited sample size, lack of blinding, lack of allocation concealment |
-67.5% had 46,XY Karyotype and the remainder had numerical and structural abberations of sex chromosomes. | |||||
One patient with 46,XY karyotype had seminoma from abdominal gonad (age 17) | |||||
CIS present in 14 patients (35%) with GD | |||||
Sex cord-derived tumors including gonadoblastoma nests and unclassified mixed germ cell-sex cord-stromal tumors were present in 11 patients (27.5%) with GD | |||||
Ages of malignancy ranged from 7 months to 19 years | |||||
Mendes, et al. 1999 [40] | Observational study | 36 patients with Turner syndrome were studied: | Abdominal | Recommend gonadectomy in Turner Syndrome patients who are Y positive | Limited sample size, lack of blinding, lack of allocation concealment |
Two patients were found to be Y positive by PCR | |||||
Of the two Y-positive patients, one had gonadoblastoma (50%) | |||||
Gourlay, et al. 1994 [42] | Observational Retrospective Study | 11 patients with PGD had gonadal tissue for review: | All but 1 patient with PGD and malignancy had abdominal gonads | Recommend early gonadectomy in all patients with XY gonadal dysgenesis as tumors can develop at an early age | Limited sample size, lack of blinding, lack of allocation concealment |
Six patients (54%) had germ cell tumors; ages ranging from 1 month to 19 years | 1 PGD patient (age 19) with a seminoma had scrotal gonads | ||||
One patient with 46,XY CGD had a gonadoblastoma (age 17) | The patient with CGD had abdominal gonads | ||||
Robboy, et al. 1982 [43] | Observational Retrospective Study | Obtained gonadal tissue from 21 patients with PGD: | 53 year old with gonadoblastoma had abdominal gonads | Recommend early gonadectomy | Limited sample size, lack of blinding, lack of allocation concealment |
-Three patients (14.2%) with XY PGD had malignancy: | One patient had a gonadoblastoma and seminoma in a scrotal-inguinal gonad 15 years after the contralateral testis was removed (age not specified) | ||||
Two patients with XY PGD had gonadoblastomas and one of these was overgrown by a seminoma. | 2 week old with seminoma had an abdominal gonad | ||||
One patient with XY PGD had seminoma (age 2 weeks) | |||||
Scully, et al. 1970 [9] | Observational Retrospective Study | Reviewed clinical characteristics of 74 cases of gonadoblastoma: | Majority were abdominal gonads | Recommend early gonadectomy | Lack of blinding, lack of allocation concealment |
25 phenotypic females, 35 virilized females, 13 phenotypic males. | Inguinal gonadoblastomas were seen in several of the phenotypic males (exact number not specified) | ||||
43 patients had invasive germinoma | |||||
Ages ranged from 1 to 38 years | |||||
Karyotypes were available in 30/74 patients: | |||||
57% had 46,XY karyotypes | |||||
30% with 45,X/46,XY karyotype | |||||
3% (1 patient) with 45,X karyotype | |||||
10% with other forms of mosaicism |
Complete XY gonadal dysgenesis (XY CGD)
Partial XY gonadal dysgenesis (XY PGD)
Recommendations (See Figure 3)
Evidence quality: low
Evidence quality: low
Evidence quality: low
2a: what are differences in risks of malignancy based on diagnoses?
Evidence
Low risk | Intermediate risk | High risk | |
---|---|---|---|
Degree of virilization
| Normally virilized males | Mild undervirilization | Ambiguous genitalia |
Location of gonad
| Scrotal gonad with normal appearance | Inguinal gonad | Abdominal gonad |
Gross pathology
| -Streak gonad without germ cells | Dysgenetic testicle that is OCT 3/4 positive with intermediate risk criteria | -Undifferentiated gonadal tissue |
-Ovary | |||
- Testicle (OCT 3/4 negative) | |||
- Dysgenetic testicle that is OCT 3/4 negative | -Dysgenetic testicle that is OCT 3/4 positive with high risk criteria | ||
Immunohistochemistry
| OCT 3/4 negative | OCT 3/4 positive cells located luminally, scattered within the whole gonad, TSPY negative or weakly positive, SCF negative, age < 1 year. | OCT 3/4 positive cells located in the basal lamina, focal location, TSPY strongly positive, SCF positive, age > 1 year. |
2b: is there a role for gonadal biopsy?
Evidence
Study | Type of study | Summary of findings | Conclusions from each study regarding use of gonadal biopsy | Design limitations |
---|---|---|---|---|
Farrugia, et al. 2013 [48] | Observational Retrospective study | Histology of 46 gonads from patients with 45,X/46,XY or 45,X/47,XYY PGD was reviewed. | In patients raised as males, where dysgenetic testes are retained, biopsy at orchidopexy and also post-pubertal with immunohistochemical staining (OCT 3/4 and TSPY) is recommended | Limited sample size, lack of blinding, lack of allocation concealment |
Does not specify who had biopsy vs. gonadectomy. | ||||
No evidence of malignancy in any patient | ||||
Wunsch, et al. 2012 [33] | Observational Cohort study | 6 out of 12 patients with mixed or partial GD had biopsy to evaluate for malignancy (no gonadectomy). | Biopsy can be used for early diagnosis of germ cell tumors and follow-up. | Limited sample size, lack of blinding, lack of allocation concealment |
1 patient found to have tubular in situ neoplasia. | ||||
Cools, et al. 2011 [36] | Observational Study | Histology of 87 gonads from patients with 45,X/46,XY was reviewed. | For mildly undervirilized males, recommend 1 prepubertal biopsy and 1 post-pubertal biopsy. | Limited sample size, lack of blinding, lack of allocation concealment |
Biopsy was done in 15 patients. | ||||
All of the tumors in this series were in situ germ cell neoplastic lesions, discovered after prophylactic gonadectomy. | In patients with ambiguous genitalia, biopsy can be used to asses tumor risk, but low threshold for gonadectomy | |||
No tumors identifed in the patients who had gonadal biopsy alone. | ||||
Gourlay, et al. 1994 [42] | Observational Retrospective Study | Reviewed pathology from 21 patients with DSD who underwent bilateral gonadectomy at time of diagnosis. | Gonadal biopsy is unreliable in excluding the presence of small tumors | Limited sample size, lack of blinding, lack of allocation concealment |
Pathology revealed many different combinations of testis, ovary, streak, and tumor within the same individual gonad. | ||||
Müller, et al. 1985 [49] | Observational Study | Gonadal tissue from multiple scrotal or labial gonadal biopsies was studied in 4 patients with 45,X/46,XY GD (ages 1 month to 18 years) | Biopsy of scrotal gonads should be done at time of diagnosis of GD to exclude presence of tumor. | Limited sample size, lack of blinding, lack of allocation concealment |
All 4 patients had evidence of CIS: | ||||
-2 patients had CIS on initial biopsy | In boys without signs of CIS on initial biopsy, repeat biopsy should be performed after puberty because prepubertal CIS lesions may be missed. | |||
-2 patients had CIS only on repeat biopsy (8 months and 16 years) |
Recommendations (see Figure 3)
Evidence quality: low
Evidence quality: low
Evidence quality: low
2c: what ethical considerations must be taken into account before undertaking gonadectomy?
Evidence
Study | Type of study | Considerations specific to gonadectomy | Relevant ethical dilemmas/principles identified | Recommendations |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gillam, et al. 2010 [51] | Review | Early Gonadectomy: | 1. Psychological issues poorly understood | 1. Improve understanding physical and psychological dilemmas facing each patient |
1. Medical indication (i.e. hernia) | 2. No guarantee of adult gender identity | 2. Thorough informed consent process | ||
2. Parental concerns about malignancy | 3. Surgical decision making places pressure on parents, who may be incompletely informed | 3. Referral to multi-disciplinary team – and if not available refrain from any potentially harmful practice or surgery | ||
3. Difficulty accepting phenotype without surgery/improved psychological outcome | ||||
Late Gonadectomy – after puberty completed | ||||
No Gonadectomy: | ||||
1. Long term follow up required | ||||
Wiesemann, et al. 2010 [50] | Review | “Unless well-being would otherwise be severely impaired, decisions about removal of organs or structures important to… physical integrity or sexual identity (such as gonads) should be left up to the affected persons themselves” | 1. Secrecy within families, lack of informed consent and adolescent assent | 1. Acknowledge that even a participant child cannot act in their future self’s best interest, only in the current best interest |
2. conflict between the interests of a child and the interests of the future adult | 2. In the absence of an objective best interest for the child in managing DSD, parents should play a major role in decision making, on a case-by-case basis | |||
3. conflict between right to familial privacy and state’s interest in protecting the child | 3. We should not make a sweeping recommendation on the timing of a surgical intervention in the absence of medical necessity | |||
4. immediacy of health threat | 4. Involvement of the child at a developmentally appropriate level | |||
5. child’s right to dignity and bodily integrity | 5. Allowing the adult patient to access all past medical records | |||
6. Careful documentation of outcomes for future information | ||||
Maharaj, et al. 2005 [52] | Review | 1.Paper addresses only infants and young children | 1. Minimizing physical risk to child | 1. Act in the best interests of the child, taking account wishes of the parents |
2. Unclear how to decide whether it is worse to be at future risk of malignancy or risk of distress in the future from gonadectomy | 2. Minimizing psychosocial risk to child | 2. In situations that are complex with no clear best answer, where future outcomes are difficult to predict, parents’ wishes should be respected | ||
3. Fertility potential may be a factor, including presence and functionality of gonads, or presence/functionality of other reproductive organs. May conflict with another risk, such as future malignancy. | 3. Preserving potential for fertility | 3. None of the principles should be considered to outweigh the others and must be appropriately balanced | ||
4. Acknowledging that there may be medical advances in the future which could allow fertility even in apparent non-functional gonadal tissue | 4. Preserving or promoting capacity to have satisfying sexual relation | 4. Ethical decision-making in this field should be approached systematically and in a multi-disciplinary fashion | ||
5. Leaving options open for the future | ||||
6. Respecting parents’ wishes and beliefs |