Background
Pneumonia is defined as an acute inflammation of the Lungs’ parenchymal structure. It can be classified based on place of acquisition: as community acquired or hospital acquired; based on its causative agents/ mechanism as bacterial, viral, fungal, Aspiration, or ventilator-associated pneumonia; based on the anatomy of the lungs involved as lobar pneumonia, bronchial pneumonia or acute interstitial pneumonia; and on the basis of its clinical severity as “no pneumonia”, “pneumonia” or “severe pneumonia” [
1‐
3].
Under-five children are more vulnerable to pneumonia and pneumonia remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in those children [
4]. According to a global estimate made in 2000, approximately 156 million cases of pneumonia had occurred each year in under-five children, of which 151 million episodes were in the developing countries and about 1.2 million of them were end up in death. South-east Asia and Africa were the two continents with high magnitude of childhood pneumonia, having an estimated of 61 million and 35 million annual cases of pneumonia in under-five children respectively [
5]. The magnitude of under-five pneumonia was decreased to 120 million (with 0.88 million deaths) in 2010 and to 102 million (with 0.7 million deaths) in 2015 globally. These decrement was due to decrease in the magnitude of its key risk factors, increasing socioeconomic development and preventive interventions, improved access to care, and quality of care in hospitals. Despite this progress, pneumonia is still a major public health problem for children especially in developing countries [
4].
Globally, many researches had been conducted to identify risk factors of pneumonia. Despite the inconsistency of findings, low birth weight, malnutrition, indoor air pollution, parental smoking, being unvaccinated, overcrowding, lack of separate kitchen, being not on exclusive breast feeding, and maternal education were identified as factors associated with occurrence of pneumonia in under-five children [
6‐
9].
Besides, in East African countries different researchers had tried to investigate the magnitude of pneumonia in under-five children and have reported a prevalence ranges from 5.5% [
10] up to 89.8% [
11]. They had also identified risk factors for pneumonia among under-five children. But, reported finding lack consistency and as per the investigators knowledge there is no a systematic review and meta-analysis conducted to address these inconsistent findings reported from East African countries. Moreover, assessing the magnitude of pneumonia and identifying its associated factors for risk based diagnosis of pneumonia contribute in better interventions and helps to reduce the higher burden of pneumonia in under-five children. Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the magnitude of pneumonia and its associated factors among under-five children in East Africa.
Methods
We identified studies providing data on the prevalence of and potential risk factors of pneumonia among under-five children, with the search focused on Eastern Africa from PubMed, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar. The search included MeSH terms and keywords, combinations, and snowball searching in references list of papers found through the data base search to retrieve additional articles. Articles with incomplete reported data were handled through contacting corresponding authors. Unpublished studies were retrieved from the official websites of international and local organizations and universities. The search was performed by keywords, medical subject headings (MeSH) terms. We used the search terms independently and/or in combination using “OR” or “AND”. The core search terms and phrases were “under five”, “children”, “child”, “infant”, and “pneumonia”, “respiratory infection”, causes, risk factors, determinants, associated factors, predictors and Eastern Africa. The search strategies were developed using different Boolean operators. Remarkably, to fit advanced PubMed database, the following search strategy was applied: (prevalence OR magnitude OR epidemiology) AND (causes OR determinants OR associated factors OR predictors OR risk factors) AND (children [MeSH Terms] OR under five OR child OR childhood) AND (pneumonia [MeSH Terms] OR respiratory tract infection) AND Eastern Africa. We also screened at the reference lists of the remaining papers to identify additional relevant studies to this review.
Study selection / eligibility criteria
Retrieved studies were exported to reference manager software, Endnote version 8 to remove duplicate studies. Two investigators (BB and AM) independently screened the selected studies using their titles and abstracts before retrieval of full-text papers. We used pre-specified inclusion criteria to further screen the full-text articles. Disagreements were discussed during a consensus meeting with other reviewers (MW and MB) for the final selection of studies to be included in the systematic review and meta-analysis.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
All observational studies (cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies) were included. Those studies had reported the prevalence and/or at least one associated factors of pneumonia among under-five children and published in English language from 2000 up to 2019 in Eastern Africa were considered. A consideration was extended to unpublished work among children under five were also considered. Citations without abstract and/or full-text, anonymous reports, editorials, and qualitative studies were excluded from the analysis. Furthermore, researches which did not report our results of interest were excluded. Regarding inclusion and exclusion criteria of included studies, children below 59 months of age with mother / care giver visiting out patients department during data collection period were included. Severely sick child need life treating intervention and whose mother / care givers refused were excluded from the study.
Quality assessment
Duplicate articles were removed using Endnote (version X8) after combining the Database search results. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) quality appraisal checklist was used [
12,
13]
. Four independent authors appraised the quality of the studies. The appraisal was repeated by exchanging with each other. Thus, one paper was appraised by two Authors. Any disagreement between the reviewers was solved by taking the mean score of the two reviewers. Studies were considered as low risk or good quality when it scored 5 and above for all designs (cross sectional, case control, and cohort) and were included [
12,
13] whereas the score was 4 and below the studies considered as high risk or poor quality and was not included.
The authors developed data extraction form on the excel sheet which includes author name, year of publication, study country, study design, sample size, prevalence of pneumonia, and categories of factors reported. The data extraction sheet was piloted using 4 papers randomly. The extraction form was adjusted after piloted the template. Two of the authors extracted the data using the extraction form in collaboration. The third and fourth authors check the correctness of the data independently. Any disagreements between reviewers were resolved through discussions with a third reviewer and fourth reviewer if required. The mistyping of data was resolved through crosschecking with the included papers. If we got incomplete data, we excluded the study after two attempts were made to contact the corresponding author by email.
Outcome measurement
Pneumonia was considered when under five children with cough and/or difficulty of breathing, have fast breathing and/or chest indrawing and suggestive X-ray findings [
14,
15].
Statistical analysis
After the data was extracted using Microsoft Excel format we imported the data to STATA version 14.0 statistical software for further analysis. Using the binomial distribution formula, Standard error was calculated for each study. We pooled the overall magnitude estimates of pneumonia by a random effect meta-analysis [
16]. The pooled prevalence of pneumonia with 95% CI was presented using forest plots and Odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI was also presented in forest plot to show the associated factors of pneumonia. We examined the heterogeneity between the studies using Cochrane’s Q statistics (Chi-square), invers variance (I2) and
p-values [
17].
In this study, the I
2 statistic value of zero indicates true homogeneity, whereas the value 25, 50, and 75% represented low, moderate and high heterogeneity respectively [
18,
19]. For the data identified as heterogeneous, we conducted our analysis by random-effects model analysis. In addition subgroup analysis was done by the study country, design, and year of publication. When statistical pooling is not possible, non-pooled data was presented in table form. Sensitivity analysis was employed to see the effect of a single study on the overall estimation. Publication bias was checked by funnel plot and more objectively through Egger’s regression test [
20].
Discussion
This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the magnitude of pneumonia and its associated factors among under-five children in East Africa. Thirty-four studies were included for the final analysis. Twenty-two studies had reported the prevalence of pneumonia and the pooled prevalence of pneumonia in under-five children was found to be 34% with 95% CI of (23.8–44.21%). This result was higher than a study conducted in Dibrugarh, India which had reported the prevalence of pneumonia in under-five children to be 16.34% [
9]. This might be due to socioeconomic and seasonal discrepancies as countries in East Africa are less developed than India. A study conducted in Nigeria had revealed the prevalence of pneumonia in under-five children to be 31.6% which was consistence with the findings of this systematic review [
53]. This consistency might be due to similarities in socio-economic status as Nigeria is an African country probably having comparable socio-economic status with east African countries. In addition the discrepancy might be due to difference in case definition of pneumonia.
This finding is higher than other studies done in Austria (4.1%) [
54], in Mali (6.7%) [
55], and in Bangladesh (21.3%) [
56]. This variation might be due to socio-economic and socio-demographic vitiations, the variation in the study setting, seasonal variation, unreachability and provision of Vitamin A supplementation and immunization, lack of confirmatory laboratories and imaging investigations.
This systematic review and meta-analysis had also revealed using woods as a source of fuel, cooking foods living rooms, holding children on back while cooking foods, being unvaccinated, history of being not on exclusive breast feeding, history of upper respiratory tract infection and parental smoking as a significant risk factors for increased prevalence of pneumonia among under-five children in East Africa.
Higher odds of pneumonia were observed in under-five children whose family uses wood as a source of fuel. This result was in line with studies conducted in India [
57], and Sri Lanka [
58]; and with systematic reviews conducted in Low and Middle income countries [
59], and Africa, China and Latin America [
60]. It was also consistent with a global review conducted by Jackson et al. [
61]. The association between using wood as a source of fuel and pneumonia in under-five children might be due to the fact that using woods as a source of fuel results in release of wood smokes containing major air pollutants like carbon monoxide and particulate matters which causes indoor air pollution [
62]. Indoor air pollution and inhaling wood smoke in turn impairs the function of pulmonary alveolar macrophages and epithelial cells which will increase the likelihood of pulmonary infections including pneumonia [
62,
63].
According to this systematic review and meta-analysis, cooking foods in living rooms was found to be significantly associated with occurrence of pneumonia in under-five children as higher odds of pneumonia was exhibited among children living in families who cooks food at living rooms than children living in families who cooks food in kitchen. Holding children on back while cooking foods was another factor found to be significantly associated with pneumonia. This association might be due to the reason that cooking foods in living rooms will cause indoor air pollution and holding a child on back while cooking foods can increase the probability of inhaling smokes and food vapors (steams) which in turn will increase the risk of acquiring pneumonia by altering the structure and function of the respiratory tract [
58,
63].
In this systematic review children with history of Acute Respiratory Tract Infections (ARTIs) were found to be at increased risk to acquire pneumonia; as the odds of pneumonia among children who had history of ARTIs was higher than children without history of ARTIs. The reason behind this association might be due to the fact that ARTIs will alter the structure and function of the respiratory tract and can cause Lower Respiratory Infections (LRTIs) including pneumonia in two ways— by increasing invasion of the Lower respiratory tract (LRT) with other microorganisms which cause secondary infections or by progressive invasion of LRT with the same microorganism causing the ARTIs (Primary infections) [
64].
The risk of acquiring pneumonia in unvaccinated children was found to be higher than vaccinated children. This result was similar with studies conducted in Brazil [
65], Bellary [
7], and India [
66]. A systematic review conducted by Jackson et al. [
61] was also in line with this result. Similarly, children who were not on exclusive breast feeding were at higher risk to develop pneumonia than children who were on exclusive breast feeding for the first 6 months of age. This result was consistent with different studies conducted across the world [
7,
61,
67,
68]. The reason behind this association might be due to low or weak immunity. Because exclusive breast feeding and vaccination are strategies used to increase the immunity of children and prevent childhood infections. So, children who were not on Exclusive breast feeding and/ or unvaccinated will have weak immunity and increased probability of acquiring infections including pneumonia [
69].
Strength and limitations
This study has several strengths: First, we used a pre-specified protocol for search strategy and data abstraction and used internationally accepted tools for a critical appraisal system for quality assessment of individual studies. Second, we employed subgroup and sensitivity analysis based on study country, study design, and publication year to identify the small study effect and the risk of heterogeneity. Nevertheless, this review had some limitations: There may be publication bias because not all grey literature was included and language biases since all included studies are published in English.
Conclusion and recommendation
The prevalence of pneumonia among under-five children in Eastern Africa remains high. Use of wood as fuel source, cooking food in living room, caring of a child on mother during cooking, being unvaccinated, on-exclusive breast feeding,child history of ARTI, and parental smoking were independent potential predictors of under-five pneumonia in Eastern Africa. Hence, appropriate intervention on potential determinates such as health education on exclusive breastfeeding, place of food cooking, increase vaccination coverage and early control of respiratory tract infection was recommended to prevent those risk factors.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.