Background
The newborn infant is a complexly organized, competent being who plays an active role in shaping their development by communicating with their caregiver and drawing out the specific caregiving and support they need to adapt to the extra-uterine environment [
1]
. Newborn infants have a specific developmental agenda after birth. They acquire skills in four neurobehavioral domains, namely, regulating their autonomic nervous system, regulating their behavioral state, controlling their motor behavior and interaction with animate and inanimate objects in their immediate environment. Assessing an infant’s neurobehavioral functioning in the four domains provides a thorough portrayal of their competencies and detect areas where support may be required, guiding responsive caregiving [
1].
Newborn behavior is dependent on genetic factors and several variables influencing the intrauterine environment. The Neurobehavioral Assessment Scale (NBAS) is a comprehensive tool to evaluate infant neurobehaviour in the first two months of life across the four domains, as the infant adapts to the world and develops competency. It allows for variability in newborn infant behavior and prenatal influences. Various factors from the mother, infant, labour and childbirth, social environment, and demographics influence neonatal behavior in the perinatal period [
1,
2]. Maternal factors include stress, mental health, drug exposure and health problems [
1,
3‐
5]. Drug exposure and health problems can include HIV infection and prescribed medication, such as antiretroviral therapy (ART) taken by the mother to prevent transmission to her infant.
South Africa is estimated to have more than 7,5 million people living with HIV, with new infections surpassing 240 000 yearly between 2010 and 2019 [
6‐
8]. With the adoption of the World Health Organization (WHO) treatment guidelines option B + , in which HIV infected pregnant women receive ART regardless of disease staging or CD4 count, the prevalence of mother to child transmission (MTCT) has decreased from near 40% to lower than 2% [
9,
10].
Infants born to mothers who are infected with HIV are exposed to the virus in-utero, and the various ARTs that the mother consumes through HIV-specific pathways. These pathways include direct exposure to the neurotropic HIV-virus, the effects of maternal inflammation and immune activation in-utero, immune activation and inflammation in the exposed fetus, which all influence brain development, and ART toxicity [
11]. Evidence from multiple studies indicates the adverse effects experienced by these infants in their early developmental years [
12‐
16]. These adverse effects include mitochondrial dysfunction, most often observed in laboratory abnormalities seizures, cognitive and motor delays, cardiac dysfunction, and slower earlier growth [
12,
14]. In assessing neuropsychological development, HIV exposed infants had lower neurodevelopmental outcomes than their unexposed counterparts, even when controlling for confounders such as poverty, nutritional status, and maternal education, which are known to negatively influence these outcomes [
12]. HIV exposed infants assessed with the Bayley Scales of development at 25 months showed inferior receptive language, social-emotional and self-regulatory skills [
17]. There are limited studies that have assessed infant behavior in the early weeks. The NBAS indicated that HIV exposed infants had poorer orientation and reflex scores than infants born to seronegative mothers. However, there is no information about ART use in their mothers [
18]. HIV exposed infants also have more feeding difficulties, specifically with regurgitating food, slowed feeding and vomiting [
19]. Some ART can cause neuropsychiatric effects like depression, emotional stress and anxiety among HIV positive pregnant women [
10,
12]. Manikkam and Burns (2012) identified HIV seropositivity as a significant risk factor for depression among pregnant women in South Africa [
20].
Infants born to depressed mothers are compromised at birth and demonstrate dysregulation over the first month of life [
21,
22]. These infants presented with difficulties in the state regulation and social interaction domains, according to NBAS scores. They were more aroused and less attentive than infants born to non-depressed mothers. These infants received lower scores on orientation to live face and voice stimuli, alertness items, cuddliness and hand to mouth actions and are described as more irritable, less consolable and more excitable [
21,
23‐
26].
The WHO guidelines for improving early childhood development focus on nurturing care. This concept includes promoting health and optimal nutrition, a stable environment, and opportunities for early learning through affectionate interactions and relationships [
27]. There is a specific focus on the period from pregnancy to the age of three, where critical periods for receiving nurturing care are present, and the fetus and infant are most sensitive to intervention and most susceptible to adverse events [
28]. The WHO declared that as an essential measure for sustainable development, enabling each young child to reach their full developmental potential is a human right, starting in pregnancy and early infancy [
27].
There is a notable lack of studies on the HIV exposed infant’s neurodevelopment and behavior in early infancy within the need for early monitoring in the changing landscape of HIV prevention.
Results
A total of 132 mother-infant pairs participated in the study. Mothers had a mean age of 29 years (median 29.5 years, range 17 years). A total of 60.6% (80) were seropositive to HIV-1 and had been on ARTs for an average of 3.53 years. EPDS scores in the maternal population indicated 72% (95) of mothers reporting depression, with 59%(56) of these mothers being HIV positive, and 41% (39) being HIV negative. There was no statistical significance found between the prevalence of depression in the two groups in an independent samples t-test with equal variances assumed (p = 0.753). There were 79 (59.8%)male and 53 (40.2%)female infants. Caesarian section deliveries under a spinal block were performed for mothers of 60.6% (80) of these infants. Exclusive breastfeeding was followed by 118 (89.4%) of the mother-infant pairs. There was a significant correlation between infant anthropometrics and HIV exposure, with HIV exposed infants being smaller than non-exposed infants, even when low birth weight (LBW) (under 2 kg) was an exclusion criterion.
Table
1 indicates the means and standard deviations of maternal and infant characteristics, with correlations between HIV-positive mothers with their exposed infants and HIV-negative mothers and their unexposed infants. There were statistically significant differences between exposed and unexposed infants in the total section scores for the behavioral items of social interaction (
p < 0.01), motor system (
p < 0.01) and state organization (
p = 0.01), as well as a number of abnormal reflexes present (
p < 0.01), with the HIV exposed infants receiving inferior scores.
Table 1
NBAS section mean scores with maternal and infant population characteristics
Maternal characteristics |
Maternal age | 29.074.91) | 27.79(4.71) | p = 0.01*# |
EPDS score | 12.19(5.50) | 13.04(4.69) | p = 0.35# |
Infant characteristics |
Infant birthweight | 3.24(0.41) | 3.49(0.38) | p < 0.01*# |
Infant head circumference | 34.80(1.39) | 35.92(1.22) | p < 0.01*# |
Infant length | 48.59(3.49) | 51.29(2.98) | p < 0.01*# |
NBAS section scores |
Habituation | n = 63 4.92(2.06) | n = 38 5.41(2.27) | p = 0.27# |
Social interaction | n = 78 2.62(1.38) | n = 52 3.44(1.73) | p < 0.01*# |
Motor system | 4.21(0.79) | 4.71(0.87) | p < 0.01*# |
State organization | 3.50(0.51) | 3.82(0.66) | p = 0.01*@ |
State regulation | 4.20(1.53) | 4.63(1.77) | p = 0.14# |
Autonomic system | 5.49(1.50) | 5.40(1.34) | p = 0.73# |
Total abnormal reflexes | 5.69(2.74) | 2.06(1.75) | p < 0.01*@ |
A closer analysis of the 52 items (27 behavioral items, seven supplementary and 18 reflex items) measured shows a statistically significant difference in most scores achieved in social interaction, motor system, supplementary items and reflexes, with HIV exposed infants receiving inferior scores. Half of the items in the habituation and state organization sections showed inferior performance of HIV exposed infants (Table
2). Not all infants were in the appropriate sleep state at the beginning of the assessment to assess the habituation items. Some woke up during the administration of the response decrement (habituation) items. The examination had to be abandoned for some infants before all the reflex items were administered, as the cost of attention was too high, the infant became significantly dysregulated or became inconsolable.
Table 2
NBAS results in all items
BEHAVIOURAL ITEMS |
HABITUATION Administered in states 1 to 3. Evaluation of response decrement to external stimulation of light, sound and touch. A measure of how well an infant protects their sleep |
Response dec.to light | n = 63 4.92(2.29) | n = 38 4.92(2.52) | p = 1.00 |
Response dec.to rattle | n = 59 4.98(2.52) | n = 32 6.38(2.18) | p = 0.01* |
Response dec.to bell | n = 49 5.14(2.81) | n = 29 7.00(2.05) | p < 0.01* |
Response dec.to foot probe | n = 45 5.56(2.06) | n = 28 6.29(1.86) | p = 0.13 |
Note: Where n value is less than 80 in the exposed infant group, and less than 52 in the unexposed infant group, it is due to the infant being in an awake state when the assessment commenced or waking up during administration of the habituation package |
SOCIAL INTERACTIVE Administered in a quiet alert state (state 4).Evaluation of the infant’s orientation to and interaction with animate (person) and inanimate (rattle and ball) visual and auditory stimuli |
Animate Visual | n = 78 2.53(2.00) | 3.00(1.89) | p = 0.18 |
Animate Visual & auditory | n = 78 2.69(2.01) | 3.42(2.02) | p = 0.05*# |
Inanimate visual | n = 78 2.03(1.71) | 3.02(2.04) | p < 0.01*# |
Inanimate visual & auditory | n = 78 2.41(1.59) | 2.77(2.03) | p = 0.26# |
Inanimate auditory | n = 78 2.59(1.36) | 3.67(2.05) | p < 0.01*@ |
Animate auditory | n = 78 3.28(1.76) | 4.02(2.16) | p = 0.03*# |
Alertness | n = 78 2.81(1.30) | 4.21(1.94) | p < 0.01*@ |
Note: Where n value is less than 80 in the exposed infant group, and less than 52 in the unexposed infant group, it is due to the infant not being able to reach and maintain a state of arousal where the social interactive package could be administered. This may be due to the infant being too sleepy, crying and needing consoling measures, or being too fragile to complete the assessment |
MOTOR SYSTEM Assessed in alert states (3 to 5). Evaluation of the motor responses of the infant to handling |
General tone | 4.94(1.18) | 5.50(1.06) | p = 0.01*# |
Motor maturity | 4.60(1.80) | 4.83(1.41) | p = 0.42@ |
Pull-to-sit | 4.03(1.04) | 4.67(0.68) | p < 0.01*@ |
Defensive | 4.00(1.90) | 4.12(2.25) | p = 0.76@ |
Activity level | 3.48(1.03) | 4.21(1.00) | p < 0.01*# |
STATE ORGANIZATION Assessed throughout the evaluation. A measure of the amount of motor and crying activity observed, as well as how the infant moves between states 1 to 6 |
Peak of excitement | 2.54(0.99) | 3.35(1.15) | p < 0.01*@ |
Rapidity of build-up | 5.70(2.67) | 5.00(2.76) | p = 0.15# |
Irritability | 2.78(1.82) | 3.42(1.95) | p = 0.05*# |
Lability of states | 2.94(1.13) | 3.33(1.06) | p = 0.05*# |
STATE REGULATION Assessed throughout the evaluation. A measure of the ability of the infant to move between and maintain their state of arousal in alert or sleep states, and the strategies used or needed to facilitate this |
Cuddliness | 6.51(1.56) | 6.75(1.28) | p = 0.36# |
Consolability | 3.19(2.16) | n = 38 3.61(2.02) | p = 0.34# |
Self-quieting | 3.47(2.79) | 4.45(2.65) | p = 0.07# |
Hand-to-mouth | 2.99(2.73) | 3.48(2.73) | p = 0.31# |
AUTONOMIC SYSTEM Assessed throughout the evaluation by observing the changes in the infant’s skin colour and vascularity, and in observations of tremors and startles-giving indication of central nervous system functioning and how the central and autonomic nervous systems are able to adapt to changes in the environment |
Tremulousness | 5.91(1.78) | 5.44(2.31) | p = 0.26# |
Startles | 6.81(1.66) | 6.58(1.99) | p = 0.46# |
Lability of skin colour | 3.40(1.22) | 4.23(1.08) | p < 0.01*# |
SUPPLEMENTARY ITEMS Assessed throughout the evaluation. A measure of the qualitative aspects of the infant’s performance |
Quality of alertness | 2.45(1.01) | 3.42(1.72) | p < 0.01*@ |
Cost of attention | 4.21(1.47) | 5.23(1.94) | p < 0.01*@ |
Examiner facilitation | 3.76(1.63) | 4.85(1.93) | p < 0.01*@ |
General irritability | 3.85(2.59) | 5.29(2.80) | p < 0.01*# |
Robustness & Endurance | 3.50(1.26) | 5.23(2.10) | p < 0.01*@ |
State regulation | 3.48(1.51) | 5.04(2.01) | p < 0.01*# |
Examiners emotional response | 4.19(2.03) | 6.15(2.40) | p < 0.01*@ |
REFLEXES Administered in an alert state 3 – 5. Evaluation of reflex items with infant in supine with head in midline |
Plantar | 1.73(0.50) | 1.98(0.24) | p < 0.01*@ |
Babinski | 1.74(0.59) | 2.04(0.39) | p < 0.01*@ |
Ankle clonus | 0.46(0.62) | 0.56(0.57) | p = 0.37# |
Rooting | 1.73(0.52) | 1.98(0.24) | p < 0.01*@ |
Sucking | 1.81(0.48) | 2.04(0.19) | p < 0.01*@ |
Glabella | 2.03(0.45) | 2.02(0.46) | p = 0.94# |
Passive resistance – legs | n = 78 1.68(0.76) | 2.08(0.436) | p < 0.01*@ |
Passive resistance – arms | n = 78 1.87(0.65) | 2.12(0.40) | p = 0.01*@ |
Palmar | n = 79 1.56(0.50) | 1.90(0.30) | p < 0.01*@ |
Placing | n = 77 1.71(0.46) | 1.81(0.40) | p = 0.22@ |
Standing | n = 77 1.51(0.50) | 1.65(0.56) | p = 0.12# |
Walking | n = 77 1.57(0.76) | 1.67(0.65) | p = 0.44# |
Crawling | n = 77 1.57(0.68) | 1.75(0.44) | p = 0.07@ |
Incurvation | n = 77 1.51(0.87) | 1.87(0.35) | p < 0.01*@ |
Tonic deviation head& eyes | n = 77 1.75(0.46) | n = 51 2.00(0.00) | p < 0.01*@ |
Nystagmus | n = 59 0.85(0.64) | n = 42 1.12(0.45) | p = 0.01*@ |
TNR | n = 77 1.34(0.55) | n = 51 1.61(0.49) | p = 0.01*# |
Moro | n = 77 1.73(0.50) | 1.96(0.34) | p < 0.01*@ |
Note: Where n value is less than 80 in the exposed infant group, and less than 52 in the unexposed infant group, it is due to the infant not being able to complete the assessment. This may be due to the infant being too sleepy, crying and needing consoling measures, or being too fragile to complete the assessment |
Significant differences between the behavioural states of infants born to mothers with possible depression and those born to mothers who do not report depression were noted. The infants born to depressed mothers showed superior motor skills, state organization and state regulation (Table
3).
Table 3
Maternal mental health and HIV status correlations with NBAS section scores
Habituation | n = 72 5.18(2.04) | n = 29 4.90(2.39) | 0.55# |
HIV + | HIV- | HIV + | HIV- | HIV + | HIV- |
n = 41 4.74(1,97) | n = 31 5.77(2.02) | n = 22 5.25(2.22) | n = 7 3.80)2.76) | 0.36# | 0.04*# |
Social interaction | n = 96 3.00(1.57) | n = 34 2.81(1.62) | 0.57# |
HIV + | HIV- | HIV + | HIV- | HIV + | HIV- |
n = 57 2.61(1.21) | n = 39 3.57(1.85) | n = 21 2.67(1.80) | n = 13 3.51(1.30) | 0.89@ | 0.36# |
Motor system | n = 97 4.50(0.80) | n = 35 4.13(0.96) | 0.03*# |
HIV + | HIV- | HIV + | HIV- | HIV + | HIV- |
n = 58 4.23(0.72) | n = 39 4.90(0.76) | n = 22 4.13(0.98) | n = 13 4.14(0.96) | 0.61# | 0.01*# |
State organization | n = 97 3.69(0.56) | n = 35 3.46(0.64) | 0.05*# |
HIV + | HIV- | HIV + | HIV- | HIV + | HIV- |
n = 58 3.55(0.46) | n = 39 3.90(0.63) | n = 22 3.40(0.61) | n = 13 3.58(0.70) | 0.24# | 0.13# |
State regulation | n = 97 4.52(1.75) | n = 35 3.96(1.17) | 0.04*@ |
HIV + | HIV- | HIV + | HIV- | HIV + | HIV- |
n = 58 4.28(1.64) | n = 39 4.89(1.87) | n = 22 4.01(1.19) | n = 13 3.87(1.18) | 0.42@ | 0.07# |
Autonomic system | n = 97 5.52(1.44) | n = 35 5.26(1.41) | 0.36# |
HIV + | HIV- | HIV + | HIV- | HIV + | HIV- |
n = 58 5.62(1.53) | n = 39 5.37(1.31) | n = 22 5.13(1.38) | n = 13 5.48(1.49) | 0.19# | 0.81# |
Total abnormal reflexes | n = 95 4.34(3.20) | n = 35 4.46(2.24) | 0.811@ |
HIV + | HIV- | HIV + | HIV- | HIV + | HIV- |
n = 56 6.04(2.87) | n = 39 1.90(1.74) | n = 22 5.23(2.02) | n = 13 3.15(2.03) | 0.17@ | 0.04*# |
Discussion
This study intended to examine the neurobehavioural functioning of HIV exposed infants, and compare these with the neurobehavioural functioning of HIV unexposed infants born at the same hospital. An interesting outcome was noted in infant anthropometrics, even with LBW as an exclusion criteria. The infants born to the HIV positive mothers, who were all on highly active antiretroviral treatment, currently in the option B + protocol, were smaller than the infants born to HIV negative mothers in all anthropometric measurements recorded. This supports the findings of some studies, indicating that infants exposed to ART have lower birth weight [
32,
33].
HIV exposed infants received inferior scores for social interaction, a measure of their ability to orientate to animate and inanimate visual and/or auditory stimuli, a finding synonymous with a previous study demonstrating HIV exposed infants to have inferior orienting and abnormal reflexes [
18]. Infants are involved in social interactions from birth, and use these skills in developing a relationship with their parents to elicit the caregiving and nurturing they need [
34]. They develop in a social-emotional context, and the dynamic, bidirectional relationship between the infant and child based on the interpretation of this social interaction influences future development [
35]. This social interaction, or orientation activities, enhances the connection between the infant and parent by the infant demonstrating their ability to respond purposively to the parent and others in the environment, and things [
1]. Suboptimal social interaction may negatively influence the development of this bidirectional relationship. The parent may think that the infant does not want to or cannot interact with them in a meaningful manner and spend less time eliciting this and socially communicating and playing with their infant. This may lead to the infant limiting their development in engaging with the world due to insufficient information being gathered from social interactions, and inadequate interpretation of these [
36].
There was a significant difference between the scores achieved by the HIV exposed and non-exposed infants in the motor system. The lower mean score for the general tone in the HIV exposed group indicates that these infants responded to handling with an average tone less than half the time and may have been hypertonic when handled. This hypertonicity in handling is characterized by a stiff, non-cuddly infant who does not mould into the body of the person holding them. This may be interpreted as rejection to a parent and may influence attachment and early development [
1,
37]. HIV exposed infants also showed inferior scores in pull to sit, which may result in their parent or caregiver being afraid of handling them for fear of hurting the fragile infant, and also decrease opportunities for increased alertness and social interaction [
1]. The lower mean score in the measure of activity level among the HIV exposed infants indicates less spontaneous and elicited motor activity shown by these infants. Motor activity is used by the infant to gain and hold a caregiver's attention, thus ensuring that their physiological and emotional needs are met. A decrease in activity may lead to deprivation of some of these needs, and influence development [
34].
State organization is a useful skill, and needed for the infant to cry or fuss to get attention and communicate needs, calm down to feed and interact with caregivers and the environment, and have adequate sleep–wake cycles. Ideally, the infant would transition smoothly between states, and use a variety dependant on their current need. Sleep states are necessary for repair, growth and adequate rest, quiet alert states are necessary for social interaction and learning, and fussing or crying is needed to communicate urgent needs [
1]. The HIV exposed infants have impaired functioning in this area, indicating that they are less available to the outside world and thus miss opportunities to shape and enhance their social, emotional, intellectual, language and motor development [
1,
37].
Congruent with the study by Scaffidi & Field in 1997, the HIV exposed infants in this study had a higher number of abnormal reflexes [
18]. This may be related to later motor delay observed in breastfed HIV exposed infants whose mothers received ART during pregnancy [
18,
38]. The higher number of abnormal reflexes noted could be due to the impact of increased stress from exposure to antiretroviral drugs as well as the HIV in utero, with resulting changes in the way the brain functions [
39,
40]
The seven supplementary items in the NBAS assessment indicated inferior functioning of the HIV exposed infant. These infants were less available in the quiet alert state needed for learning from interaction with people and the environment. They also had a higher cost of attention in participation in the assessment, becoming more dysregulated and disorganized in their behavioral responses. This level of disorganization will occur during routine handling of the infant, especially in social situations where the infant is passed to and handled by different people. They also required more effort and facilitation from the examiner to transition into a state of arousal where the assessment could be completed. Persistent examiner action and effort is needed in strategies like rocking, containment and allowing the infant to suckle [
1]. These HIV exposed infants are more irritable to stimuli and handling, less able to regulate their state of arousal, and less robust in coping with the loading of multisensory stimuli from participation in the assessment. This makes them unavailable for rewarding and meaningful social interaction and thus less responsive to developmental opportunities in the environment [
1,
41]. The infant’s ability to regulate their behavioral state in the neonatal period is indicative of the integrity of myelination of the vagal system in the last trimester of pregnancy, which forms a neural base for the development of motor skills and social behavior. The HIV exposed infant, who in this study was exposed to ART for their entire gestation, may have altered development in the vagal system myelination and subsequently altered cortical regulation of arousal [
42].
In this cohort, the prevalence of postnatal depression, at 72% was notably higher than previously reported rates in developing countries of 19.8% to 42.4% [
43‐
45], with no statistical significance between the HIV positive and HIV negative group. The reasons for this may be attributed partially to birth type and the physical and emotional difficulty experienced in recovering from birth [
46,
47]. “Baby Blues”, with symptoms including tearfulness, fatigue, emotionality, anxiety, and muddled thinking, are a common manifestation in the postpartum period, reported in up to 55% of women globally, usually occurring 1 week to 10 days after birth [
48]. A possible reason for a lack of statistical significance between the HIV-positive and HIV-negative groups regarding depression could be that risk factors for developing depression during pregnancy and in the post-partum period include low social support, unemployment, low household income, single status, all factors that are largely experienced by this cohort of mothers making use of this state hospital [
49,
50]. A more indepth analysis of the correlations of maternal mental health with perceptions of caregiving competency in this cohort showed no statistically significant correlations between clinical variables (including HIV status and years on ART) and depression but did indicate statistically significant correlations between depression and employment (
p = 0.01), and birth type (
p = 0.03) six weeks after giving birth [
50]. The infants born to mothers with possible depression performed better in motor skills, state organization, and state regulation than infants born to non-depressed mothers. This is a surprising result, and in contrast with studies, also using self-report measures as an indicator for possible depression, that indicate the poorer performance of these infants in: state organization, state regulation, orientation, alertness, cuddliness, and irritability [
21‐
26]. This may be due to stress reactions in the foetus, with activation of the hypothalamo-pituitary axis and increased cortisol secretion which may result in the infant being more adaptable to external stresses from the changing, dynamic extra-uterine environment as they have more experience in dealing with stress [
20].
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.