Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 1/2024

19.09.2023 | Original Article

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UNILF): outcomes at 7 years

verfasst von: Quentin Hamel, Rémi Prebet, Olivier Lucas, Ghassan Hayek, Henry-François Parent, Audrey Angelliaume

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To assess clinical, functional and radiographical results of one-level minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UNILIF) in the treatment of stable lumbar degenerative diseases with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up.

Material and method

From January 2012 to December 2016, clinical and radiological data of patients with degenerative lumbar disease managed by UNILIF were prospectively collected. Patients with a follow-up that ended before 5 years were excluded. SF-12, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) were collected preoperatively, at 2 years and at the last follow-up. A full-spine standing radiograph was performed at each follow-up appointment.

Results

Mean operative time was 74.7 (± 19) minutes, mean blood loss was 131.1 (± 207) ml and mean follow-up was 7.5 (± 1.7) years. All functional scores and VAS were significantly improved between the preoperative and the 2 years postoperative. Between the 2 years postoperative and the last follow-up ODI and VAS continued to significantly improved. Fusion rate was 98.6% on radiographic analysis at follow-up.

Conclusion

UNILIF method is a safe and effective surgical strategy. It provides a durable improvement in functional score over 7 years of follow-up with a stable radiological correction over time.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mobbs RJ, Sivabalan P, Li J (2012) Minimally invasive surgery compared to open spinal fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine pathologies. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas 19(6):829–835 Mobbs RJ, Sivabalan P, Li J (2012) Minimally invasive surgery compared to open spinal fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine pathologies. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas 19(6):829–835
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rouben D, Casnellie M, Ferguson M (2011) Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 24(5):288–296CrossRefPubMed Rouben D, Casnellie M, Ferguson M (2011) Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 24(5):288–296CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris BM, Hilibrand AS, Savas PE, Pellegrino A, Vaccaro AR, Siegler S et al (2004) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 29(4):E65-70CrossRefPubMed Harris BM, Hilibrand AS, Savas PE, Pellegrino A, Vaccaro AR, Siegler S et al (2004) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 29(4):E65-70CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Slucky AV, Brodke DS, Bachus KN, Droge JA, Braun JT (2006) Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc 6(1):78–85CrossRef Slucky AV, Brodke DS, Bachus KN, Droge JA, Braun JT (2006) Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc 6(1):78–85CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiao SW, Jiang H, Yang LJ, Xiao ZM (2015) Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with cage fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 24(4):764–774CrossRefPubMed Xiao SW, Jiang H, Yang LJ, Xiao ZM (2015) Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with cage fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 24(4):764–774CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu P, Pan T, Dai T, Chen G, Qin SK (2018) Is unilateral pedicle screw fixation superior than bilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg 13(1):296CrossRef Lu P, Pan T, Dai T, Chen G, Qin SK (2018) Is unilateral pedicle screw fixation superior than bilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg 13(1):296CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ren C, Qin R, Sun P, Wang P (2017) Effectiveness and safety of unilateral pedicle screw fixation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(4):441–450CrossRefPubMed Ren C, Qin R, Sun P, Wang P (2017) Effectiveness and safety of unilateral pedicle screw fixation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(4):441–450CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Giorgi H, Prebet R, Andriantsimiavona R, Tropiano P, Blondel B, Parent HF (2018) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UNILIF): morbidity, clinical and radiological 2-year outcomes of a 66-patient prospective series. Eur Spine J 27(8):1933–1939CrossRefPubMed Giorgi H, Prebet R, Andriantsimiavona R, Tropiano P, Blondel B, Parent HF (2018) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UNILIF): morbidity, clinical and radiological 2-year outcomes of a 66-patient prospective series. Eur Spine J 27(8):1933–1939CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ee WWG, Lau WLJ, Yeo W, Von Bing Y, Yue WM (2014) Does minimally invasive surgery have a lower risk of surgical site infections compared with open spinal surgery? Clin Orthop 472(6):1718–1724CrossRefPubMed Ee WWG, Lau WLJ, Yeo W, Von Bing Y, Yue WM (2014) Does minimally invasive surgery have a lower risk of surgical site infections compared with open spinal surgery? Clin Orthop 472(6):1718–1724CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ould-Slimane M, Cantogrel P, Lefèvre E, Parent HF, Gauthé R (2020) Minimally invasive unilateral lumbar interbody fusion (UNILIF) in over-80-year-olds. Continuous series of 42 patients at 1.4 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 106(2):275–279CrossRefPubMed Ould-Slimane M, Cantogrel P, Lefèvre E, Parent HF, Gauthé R (2020) Minimally invasive unilateral lumbar interbody fusion (UNILIF) in over-80-year-olds. Continuous series of 42 patients at 1.4 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 106(2):275–279CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen X, Wang L, Zhang H, Gu X, Gu G, He S (2016) Radiographic analysis of one-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) with unilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases. Clin Spine Surg Spine Publ 29(1):E1-8CrossRef Shen X, Wang L, Zhang H, Gu X, Gu G, He S (2016) Radiographic analysis of one-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) with unilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases. Clin Spine Surg Spine Publ 29(1):E1-8CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Xue H, Tu Y, Cai M (2012) Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine J 12(3):209–215CrossRefPubMed Xue H, Tu Y, Cai M (2012) Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine J 12(3):209–215CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rinella AS, Edwards C (2005) Pseudarthrosis in primary fusions for adult idiopathic scoliosis: incidence, risk factors, and outcome analysis. Spine 30(4):468–474CrossRefPubMed Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rinella AS, Edwards C (2005) Pseudarthrosis in primary fusions for adult idiopathic scoliosis: incidence, risk factors, and outcome analysis. Spine 30(4):468–474CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang S, Xia H, Cong M, Guo A, Ma K, Song M (2022) Unilateral pedicle screw fixation of lumber spine: a safe internal fixation method. Heliyon 8(11):e11621CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yang S, Xia H, Cong M, Guo A, Ma K, Song M (2022) Unilateral pedicle screw fixation of lumber spine: a safe internal fixation method. Heliyon 8(11):e11621CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng X, Zhang K, Sun X, Tian H, Zhao C, Zhao J (2022) Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine J 22(10):1687–1693CrossRefPubMed Cheng X, Zhang K, Sun X, Tian H, Zhao C, Zhao J (2022) Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine J 22(10):1687–1693CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukushima M, Oshima Y, Yuzawa Y, Tanaka S, Inanami H (2020) Clinical and radiographic analysis of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented one-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Sci Rep 10(1):3105ADSCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fukushima M, Oshima Y, Yuzawa Y, Tanaka S, Inanami H (2020) Clinical and radiographic analysis of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented one-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Sci Rep 10(1):3105ADSCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Jia J, Chen C, Wang P, Wang L, Liu X (2023) Comparison of adjacent segment degeneration after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Clin Spine Surg 36(1):E45-50CrossRefPubMed Jia J, Chen C, Wang P, Wang L, Liu X (2023) Comparison of adjacent segment degeneration after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Clin Spine Surg 36(1):E45-50CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Heemskerk JL, Oluwadara Akinduro O, Clifton W, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Abode-Iyamah KO (2021) Long-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive versus open single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis. Spine J 21(12):2049–2065CrossRefPubMed Heemskerk JL, Oluwadara Akinduro O, Clifton W, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Abode-Iyamah KO (2021) Long-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive versus open single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis. Spine J 21(12):2049–2065CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Roh YH, Lee JC, Hwang J, Cho HK, Soh J, Choi SW et al (2022) Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 10-year follow-up results. J Korean Med Sci 37(13):e105CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Roh YH, Lee JC, Hwang J, Cho HK, Soh J, Choi SW et al (2022) Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 10-year follow-up results. J Korean Med Sci 37(13):e105CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UNILF): outcomes at 7 years
verfasst von
Quentin Hamel
Rémi Prebet
Olivier Lucas
Ghassan Hayek
Henry-François Parent
Audrey Angelliaume
Publikationsdatum
19.09.2023
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07946-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

European Spine Journal 1/2024 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

29.05.2024 Periprothetische Infektionen Nachrichten

Zur Zementierung einer Knie-TEP wird in Deutschland zu über 98% Knochenzement verwendet, der mit einem Antibiotikum beladen ist. Ob er wirklich besser ist als Zement ohne Antibiotikum, kann laut Registerdaten bezweifelt werden.

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.