Mental health in adolescents with obesity: conflicting views among physicians, a qualitative study

Mental health issues in adolescents with obesity are multifold, with no explicit screening recommendations. The aim of this research is to explore how this screening is performed by physicians and, thus, how it impacts adolescents’ care pathways, offering insights into how to improve it through a qualitative study using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Twenty physicians (non-psychiatrist physicians and child and adolescent psychiatrists) involved at various stages in the care pathway were interviewed with semi-structured questionnaires. The findings connect 2 meta-themes. Non-psychiatrist physicians perceive widespread but ill-defined suffering in adolescents with obesity. Non-psychiatrist physicians see screening for mental conditions as mandatory. Unlike child and adolescent psychiatrists, they are not experts in distinguishing psychosocial suffering from psychiatric disorders. Screening is clinical. Adolescents’ demand to lose weight in a context of shaming and alexithymia limits their access to psychiatric care. Child and adolescent psychiatrists then redefine the medical response to polymorphous symptoms. Psychiatric diagnoses mainly involve anxiety and depression symptoms, seldom eating disorders.

    Conclusion: Physicians have overtly conflicting perspectives over the intensity of mental conditions. Non-psychiatrists, sensitive to perceived distress, seek to have it quickly appraised if they detect a significant suffering. Child and adolescent psychiatrists find appraisal complex to perform in the absence of means, interest, and/or experience. Improving screening requires training health professionals and using multidisciplinary assessment means.