nach oben

Erschienen in:

17.07.2023 | Research

Effect of irradiance and exposure time on the adhesive properties of universal adhesives after 2 years of storage

verfasst von: Karoline G. B. A. Cavalcanti, Camilo Pulido, Pedro H. A. Moreira, Camila F. Monteles, Byron L. C. Salvatierra, Fabiana S. F. Siqueira, Carlos J. Soares, Alessandra Reis, Alessandro D. Loguercio, Andres F. M. Cardenas

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 9/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the effects of exposure time and irradiance on the dentin bonding properties (microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and nanoleakage (NL)) of the Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CUQ) adhesive and Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SBU) immediately and after 2 years of water storage.

Material and methods

Hence, 128 human molars were randomly assigned to 16 groups based on adhesive strategy, irradiance/exposure times, and storage time for each universal adhesive tested. The adhesives were applied using the etch-and-rinse and self-etch strategies and were light-cured using four different irradiance/exposure times: 1400 mW/cm² for 5 s (1400 × 5), 1400 mW/cm² for 10 s (1400 × 10), 3200 mW/cm² for 5 s (3200 × 5), and 3200 mW/cm² for 10 s (3200 × 10). Then, each sample was restored and sectioned into a resin-dentin bonded stick to be tested for μTBS and NL (immediately and after 2 years of water storage). The mean μTBS and NL of all resin-dentin bonded sticks from the same hemi-tooth (factor time) were statistically analyzed using a three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (a = 0.05).

Results

Despite a significant decrease in the μTBS values for all groups after 2 years of water storage, the 3200 × 5 group showed higher μTBS values, whereas the 3200 × 10 group showed lower μTBS values for both universal adhesives tested. Although a significant increase in the NL values was observed for all groups after 2 years of water storage, the 3200 × 10 group showed higher NL values than the other groups (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Results indicate that light-curing the adhesive layer with 14–16 J/cm² led to an improvement in the stability of the resin-dentin adhesive interface. A longer exposure time (10 s) coupled with a higher irradiance (3200 mW/cm²) resulted in a greater degree of degradation of the adhesive interface.

Clinical significance

To guarantee better stability of the adhesive interface, clinicians could be preferred a light-cured universal adhesive layer with 14–16 J/cm². Higher irradiances should be avoided.

Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J (2012) Bonding effectiveness of a new “multi-mode” adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 40:475–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.012CrossRefPubMed

Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF (2015) Bond strength of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 43:765–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003CrossRefPubMed

Munoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH (2013) Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent 41:404–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001CrossRefPubMed

Nagarkar S, Theis-Mahon N, Perdigao J (2019) Universal dental adhesives: current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 107:2121–2131. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34305CrossRefPubMed

Cuevas-Suarez CE, da Rosa WLO, Lund RG, da Silva AF, Piva E (2019) Bonding performance of universal adhesives: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 21:7–26. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a41975CrossRefPubMed

Munoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, Hass V, Reis A, Campanha NH, Loguercio AD (2015) In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Oper Dent 40:282–292. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-055-LCrossRefPubMed

Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, Diolosa M, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, Pashley DH, Tay F, Breschi L (2014) Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. J Dent 42:603–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.008CrossRefPubMed

Hass V, Abuna G, Pinheiro Feitosa V, Martini EC, Sinhoreti MA, Furtado Carvalho R, Coelho Bandeca M, Sauro S, Loguercio AD (2017) Self-etching enamel bonding using acidic functional monomers with different-length carbon chains and hydrophilicity. J Adhes Dent 19:497–505. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a39565CrossRefPubMed

Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Irie M, Ogawa T, Van Landuyt KL, Osaka A, Suzuki K, Minagi S, Van Meerbeek B (2011) Nanolayering of phosphoric acid ester monomer on enamel and dentin. Acta Biomater 7:3187–3195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.04.026CrossRefPubMed

10.

Wendlinger M, Pomacondor-Hernandez C, Pintado-Palomino K, Cochinski GD, Loguercio AD (2023) Are universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse mode better than old 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesives? One-year evaluation of bonding properties to dentin. J Dent 132:104481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104481CrossRefPubMed

11.

Jin X, Han F, Wang Q, Yuan X, Zhou Q, Xie H, Niu L, Chen C (2022) The roles of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate and its calcium salt in preserving the adhesive-dentin hybrid layer. Dent Mater 38:1194–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.06.007CrossRefPubMed

12.

Salz U, Zimmermann J, Zeuner F, Moszner N (2005) Hydrolytic stability of self-etching adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent 7:107–116PubMed

13.

Luque-Martinez IV, Perdigao J, Munoz MA, Sezinando A, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2014) Effects of solvent evaporation time on immediate adhesive properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 30:1126–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.002CrossRefPubMed

14.

Almusa A, Delgado AHS, Ashley P, Young AM (2021) Determination of dental adhesive composition throughout solvent drying and polymerization using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Polymers (Basel) 13(22):3886. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13223886

15.

Cadenaro M, Maravic T, Comba A, Mazzoni A, Fanfoni L, Hilton T, Ferracane J, Breschi L (2019) The role of polymerization in adhesive dentistry. Dent Mater 35:e1–e22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.012CrossRefPubMed

16.

Cadenaro M, Antoniolli F, Sauro S, Tay FR, Di Lenarda R, Prati C, Biasotto M, Contardo L, Breschi L (2005) Degree of conversion and permeability of dental adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 113:525–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00251.xCrossRefPubMed

17.

Bakhsh TA, Tagami J, Sadr A, Luong MN, Turkistani A, Almhimeed Y, Alshouibi E (2020) Effect of light irradiation condition on gap formation under polymeric dental restoration; OCT study. Z Med Phys 30:194–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2020.02.001CrossRefPubMed

18.

Reis A, Ferreira SQ, Costa TR, Klein-Junior CA, Meier MM, Loguercio AD (2010) Effects of increased exposure times of simplified etch-and-rinse adhesives on the degradation of resin-dentin bonds and quality of the polymer network. Eur J Oral Sci 118:502–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00759.xCrossRefPubMed

19.

Breschi L, Cadenaro M, Antoniolli F, Sauro S, Biasotto M, Prati C, Tay FR, Di Lenarda R (2007) Polymerization kinetics of dental adhesives cured with LED: correlation between extent of conversion and permeability. Dent Mater 23:1066–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.040CrossRefPubMed

20.

Szesz A, Cuadros-Sanchez J, Hass V, da Cruz GK, Arrais CA, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2015) Influence of delivered radiant exposure values on bonding of fiber posts to root canals. J Adhes Dent 17:181–188. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a34057CrossRefPubMed

21.

Hass V, Luque-Martinez I, Sabino NB, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2012) Prolonged exposure times of one-step self-etch adhesives on adhesive properties and durability of dentine bonds. J Dent 40:1090–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.09.003CrossRefPubMed

22.

Slack WE, Yancey EM, Lien W, Sheridan R, Phoenix R, Vandewalle K (2020) Effect of high-irradiance light curing on exposure times and pulpal temperature of adequately polymerized composite. Dent Mater J. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-236CrossRefPubMed

23.

Leprince JG, Hadis M, Shortall AC, Ferracane JL, Devaux J, Leloup G, Palin WM (2011) Photoinitiator type and applicability of exposure reciprocity law in filled and unfilled photoactive resins. Dent Mater 27:157–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.09.011CrossRefPubMed

24.

Hadis M, Leprince JG, Shortall AC, Devaux J, Leloup G, Palin WM (2011) High irradiance curing and anomalies of exposure reciprocity law in resin-based materials. J Dent 39:549–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.05.007CrossRefPubMed

25.

Cardenas A, Siqueira F, Nunez A, Nonato RF, Cavalcanti K, Soares CJ, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2022) Influence of irradiance and exposure times on the mechanical and adhesive properties of universal adhesives with dentin. Oper Dent 47:412–424. https://doi.org/10.2341/21-042-LCrossRefPubMed

26.

Perdigao J, Geraldeli S, Carmo AR, Dutra HR (2002) In vivo influence of residual moisture on microtensile bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives. J Esthet Restor Dent 14:31–38CrossRefPubMed

27.

Reis A, Grande RH, Oliveira GM, Lopes GC, Loguercio AD (2007) A 2-year evaluation of moisture on microtensile bond strength and nanoleakage. Dent Mater 23:862–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.05.005CrossRefPubMed

28.

Reis A, Loguercio AD, Azevedo CL, de Carvalho RM, da Julio SM, Grande RH (2003) Moisture spectrum of demineralized dentin for adhesive systems with different solvent bases. J Adhes Dent 5:183–192PubMed

29.

Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A (2002) Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 30:371–382CrossRefPubMed

30.

Hass V, Dobrovolski M, Zander-Grande C, Martins GC, Gordillo LA, Rodrigues Accorinte Mde L, Gomes OM, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2013) Correlation between degree of conversion, resin-dentin bond strength and nanoleakage of simplified etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 29:921–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.05.001CrossRefPubMed

31.

Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

32.

Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 28:3757–3785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044CrossRefPubMed

33.

Hass V, Matos TP, Parreiras SO, Szesz AL, de Souza JJ, Gutierrez MF, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2022) An 18-month clinical evaluation of prolonged polymerization of a universal adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Dent Mater 38:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.10.012CrossRefPubMed

34.

Heintze SD, Ruffieux C, Rousson V (2010) Clinical performance of cervical restorations–a meta-analysis. Dent Mater 26:993–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.06.003CrossRefPubMed

35.

Schroeder M, Correa IC, Bauer J, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2017) Influence of adhesive strategy on clinical parameters in cervical restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 62:36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.006CrossRefPubMed

36.

Mouhat M, Mercer J, Stangvaltaite L, Ortengren U (2017) Light-curing units used in dentistry: factors associated with heat development-potential risk for patients. Clin Oral Investig 21:1687–1696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1962-5CrossRefPubMed

37.

Andreatta LM, Furuse AY, Prakki A, Bombonatti JF, Mondelli RF (2016) Pulp chamber heating: an in vitro study evaluating different light sources and resin composite layers. Braz Dent J 27:675–680. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201600328CrossRefPubMed

38.

Armellin E, Bovesecchi G, Coppa P, Pasquantonio G, Cerroni L (2016) LED curing lights and temperature changes in different tooth sites. Biomed Res Int 2016:1894672. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1894672CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

39.

Silva EMD, Penelas AG, Simmer FS, Paiva RV, Moreira ESVL, Poskus LT (2018) Can the use of a warm-air stream for solvent evaporation lead to a dangerous temperature increase during dentin hybridization? J Adhes Dent 20:335–340. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a40990CrossRefPubMed

40.

Cadenaro M, Breschi L, Antoniolli F, Navarra CO, Mazzoni A, Tay FR, Di Lenarda R, Pashley DH (2008) Degree of conversion of resin blends in relation to ethanol content and hydrophilicity. Dent Mater 24:1194–1200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.012CrossRefPubMed

41.

Peutzfeldt A (1997) Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems. Eur J Oral Sci 105:97–116CrossRefPubMed

42.

Atai M, Motevasselian F (2009) Temperature rise and degree of photopolymerization conversion of nanocomposites and conventional dental composites. Clin Oral Investig 13:309–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0236-2CrossRefPubMed

43.

Andrzejewska E (2001) Photopolymerization kinetics of multifunctional monomers. Prog Polym Sci 26:605–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00004-1CrossRef

44.

Wambier L, Malaquias T, Wambier DS, Patzlaff RT, Bauer J, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2014) Effects of prolonged light exposure times on water sorption, solubility and cross-linking density of simplified etch-and-rinse adhesives. J Adhes Dent 16:229–234. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a32034CrossRefPubMed

45.

Matos AB, Trevelin LT, Silva B, Francisconi-Dos-Rios LF, Siriani LK, Cardoso MV (2017) Bonding efficiency and durability: current possibilities. Braz Oral Res 31:e57. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0057CrossRefPubMed

46.

Perdigao J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC (2012) Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 25:153–158PubMed

47.

Armstrong S, Breschi L, Ozcan M, Pfefferkorn F, Ferrari M, Van Meerbeek B (2017) Academy of dental materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using micro-tensile bond strength (muTBS) approach. Dent Mater 33:133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.015CrossRefPubMed

48.

Papadogiannis D, Dimitriadi M, Zafiropoulou M, Gaintantzopoulou MD, Eliades G (2019) Universal adhesives: setting characteristics and reactivity with dentin. Materials (Basel) 12(10):1720. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12101720CrossRefPubMed

49.

Kharouf N, Ashi T, Eid A, Maguina L, Zghal J, Sekayan N, Bourgi R, Hardan L, Sauro S, Haikel Y, Mancino D (2021) Does adhesive layer thickness and tag length influence short/long-term bond strength of universal adhesive systems? An in-vitro study. Appl Sci 11:2635CrossRef

50.

Huang XQ, Pucci CR, Luo T, Breschi L, Pashley DH, Niu LN, Tay FR (2017) No-waiting dentine self-etch concept-Merit or hype. J Dent 62:54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.007CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Effect of irradiance and exposure time on the adhesive properties of universal adhesives after 2 years of storage
verfasst von: Karoline G. B. A. Cavalcanti
Camilo Pulido
Pedro H. A. Moreira
Camila F. Monteles
Byron L. C. Salvatierra
Fabiana S. F. Siqueira
Carlos J. Soares
Alessandra Reis
Alessandro D. Loguercio
Andres F. M. Cardenas
Publikationsdatum: 17.07.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 9/2023
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05142-8

Update Zahnmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Effect of irradiance and exposure time on the adhesive properties of universal adhesives after 2 years of storage