nach oben

Clinical Oral Investigations

Erschienen in:

01.02.2024 | Research

Does the universal adhesive’s film thickness affect dentin-bonding effectiveness?

verfasst von: Chuliang Tang, Ben Mercelis, Kumiko Yoshihara, Marleen Peumans, Bart Van Meerbeek

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 2/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the influence of adhesive resin application modalities on the film thickness of the adhesive resin and the effectiveness of a two-step universal adhesive (UA) bonded in self-etch (SE) bonding mode to high C-factor class-I cavity-bottom dentin.

Materials and methods

After application of the primer of G2-Bond Universal (G2B, GC), the adhesive resin was applied into standard class-I cavities (human molars) following four application modalities: (1) one layer, strongly air-blown; (2) one layer, gently air-blown; (3) two layers, each gently air-blown; (4) one layer, not air-blown. After being restored with composite, each tooth was sectioned to obtain one micro-specimen (n = 10), of which the adhesive resin film thickness was measured using optical microscopy. The micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) was tested immediately or upon 100,000 thermocycles. Statistical analyses involved Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U testing (p < 0.05).

Results

G2B’s μTBS was significantly affected by the adhesive resin application modality and aging. Gently air-blowing the adhesive resin resulted in significantly higher immediate μTBS than strong air-blowing or no air-blowing. No significant difference in μTBS was found between single or double gently air-blown adhesive resin applications. The adhesive resin film thickness significantly varied with the application modalities.

Conclusions

A too thin or too thick adhesive resin film thickness adversely affected bond strength of the two-step UA applied in SE mode and high C-factor condition.

Clinical relevance

The adhesive resin layer thickness can affect the bonding performance of two-step UAs in high C-factor cavities. Dental clinicians remain advised to avoid improper air-blowing of UAs and strictly follow the application instructions.

Cidreira Boaro LC, Pereira Lopes D, de Souza ASC, Lie Nakano E, Ayala Perez MD, Pfeifer CS, Gonçalves F (2019) Clinical performance and chemical-physical properties of bulk fill composites resin - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater 35(10):e249–e264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.007CrossRefPubMed

Ferracane JL, Hilton TJ (2016) Polymerization stress–is it clinically meaningful? Dent Mater 32(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.020CrossRefPubMed

Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL (1987) Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66(11):1636–1639. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660110601CrossRefPubMed

Van Ende A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B (2013) Bulk-filling of high C-factor posterior cavities: effect on adhesion to cavity-bottom dentin. Dent Mater 29(3):269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.11.002CrossRefPubMed

De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B (2005) A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 84(2):118–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400204CrossRefPubMed

Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Peumans M (2020) From Buonocore’s pioneering acid-etch technique to self-adhering restoratives. A status perspective of rapidly advancing dental adhesive technology. J Adhes Dent 22(1):7–34. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a43994CrossRefPubMed

Perdigão J (2020) Current perspectives on dental adhesion: (1) dentin adhesion - not there yet. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 56(1):190–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.08.004CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fujiwara S, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Imai A, Watanabe H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Nakatsuka T, Miyazaki M (2018) Effect of double-layer application on bond quality of adhesive systems. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 77:501–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.10.008CrossRefPubMed

Zheng L, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J (2001) Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 26(1):97–104PubMed

10.

Lodovici E, Reis A, Geraldeli S, Ferracane JL, Ballester RY, Rodrigues Filho LE (2009) Does adhesive thickness affect resin-dentin bond strength after thermal/load cycling? Oper Dent 34(1):58–64. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-37CrossRefPubMed

11.

D’Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Prosperi GD, Di Bussolo G, De Angelis F, D’Amario M, Caputi S (2009) The influence of adhesive thickness on the microtensile bond strength of three adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent 11(2):109–115PubMed

12.

Gauthier MA, Stangel I, Ellis TH, Zhu XX (2005) Oxygen inhibition in dental resins. J Dent Res 84(8):725–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400808CrossRefPubMed

13.

Oyama K, Tsujimoto A, Otsuka E, Shimizu Y, Shiratsuchi K, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Miyazaki M (2012) Influence of oxygen inhibition on the surface free energy and enamel bond strength of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater J 31(1):26–31. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-162CrossRefPubMed

14.

Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH (1990) The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 69(10):1652–1658. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690100501CrossRefPubMed

15.

Suh BI (2004) Oxygen-inhibited layer in adhesion dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent 16(5):316–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00060.xCrossRefPubMed

16.

Perdigão J, Araujo E, Ramos RQ, Gomes G, Pizzolotto L (2021) Adhesive dentistry: current concepts and clinical considerations. J Esthet Restor Dent 33(1):51–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12692CrossRefPubMed

17.

Cadenaro M, Antoniolli F, Sauro S, Tay FR, Di Lenarda R, Prati C, Biasotto M, Contardo L, Breschi L (2005) Degree of conversion and permeability of dental adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 113(6):525–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00251.xCrossRefPubMed

18.

Miyazaki M, Onose H, Iida N, Kazama H (2003) Determination of residual double bonds in resin-dentin interface by Raman spectroscopy. Dent Mater 19(3):245–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00039-8CrossRefPubMed

19.

Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (1993) Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 72(10):1434–1442. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720101401CrossRefPubMed

20.

Tang C, Ahmed MH, Yao C, Mercelis B, Yoshihara K, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B (2023) Experimental two-step universal adhesives bond durably in a challenging high C-factor cavity model. Dent Mater 39(1):70–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.11.021CrossRefPubMed

21.

Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL (1990) Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69(6):1240–1243. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690060301CrossRefPubMed

22.

Ahmed MH, Yao C, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B (2020) Extra bonding layer compensates universal adhesive’s thin film thickness. J Adhes Dent 22(5):483–501. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a45179CrossRefPubMed

23.

Perdigão J, Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez IV, Staichak R, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2014) Immediate adhesive properties to dentin and enamel of a universal adhesive associated with a hydrophobic resin coat. Oper Dent 39(5):489–499. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-203-lrCrossRefPubMed

24.

Zecin-Deren A, Sokolowski J, Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Piwonski I, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Lapinska B (2019) Multi-layer application of self-etch and universal adhesives and the effect on dentin bond strength. Molecules 24(2):345. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24020345CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G (1999) Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 15(2):128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00022-6CrossRefPubMed

26.

El-Askary FS, Van Noort R (2011) Effect of air-drying pressure and distance on microtensile bond strength of a self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 13(2):147. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a18782CrossRefPubMed

27.

Hiraishi N, Breschi L, Prati C, Ferrari M, Tagami J, King NM (2007) Technique sensitivity associated with air-drying of HEMA-free, single-bottle, one-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 23(4):498–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.007CrossRefPubMed

28.

Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J (2007) Effects of solvent drying time on micro-shear bond strength and mechanical properties of two self-etching adhesive systems. Dent Mater 23(9):1114–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.042CrossRefPubMed

29.

Armstrong S, Breschi L, Özcan M, Pfefferkorn F, Ferrari M, Van Meerbeek B (2017) Academy of Dental Materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) approach. Dent Mater 33(2):133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.015CrossRefPubMed

30.

R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing (version 4.0.3). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org

31.

Tang C, Ahmed MH, Yao C, Mercelis B, Yoshihara K, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B (2023) Bonding performance of experimental HEMA-free two-step universal adhesives to low C-factor flat dentin. Dent Mater 39(6):603–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.04.008CrossRefPubMed

32.

Yao C, Ahmed MH, Li X, Nedeljkovic I, Vandooren J, Mercelis B, Zhang F, Van Landuyt KL, Huang C, Van Meerbeek B (2020) Zinc-calcium-fluoride bioglass-based innovative multifunctional dental adhesive with thick adhesive resin film thickness. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12(27):30120–30135. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c06865CrossRefPubMed

33.

Sakaguchi R, Ferracane J, Powers J (eds) (2019) Craig’s restorative dental materials. Elsevier, St. Louis, Missouri

34.

Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL (2000) The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res 79(3):812–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790030501CrossRefPubMed

35.

Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ (2005) Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 21(12):1150–1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.004CrossRefPubMed

36.

Braga RR, Ballester RY, Ferracane JL (2005) Factors involved in the development of polymerization shrinkage stress in resin-composites: a systematic review. Dent Mater 21(10):962–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.018CrossRefPubMed

37.

Nikolaenko SA, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf M, Petschelt A, Dasch W, Frankenberger R (2004) Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Dent Mater 20(6):579–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.08.001CrossRefPubMed

38.

Kim HJ, Park SH (2014) Measurement of the internal adaptation of resin composites using micro-CT and its correlation with polymerization shrinkage. Oper Dent 39(2):E57-70. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-378-lCrossRefPubMed

39.

Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Peumans M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2005) Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 84(2):183–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400214CrossRefPubMed

40.

De Munck J, Ermis RB, Koshiro K, Inoue S, Ikeda T, Sano H, Van Landuyt KL, Van Meerbeek B (2007) NaOCl degradation of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to enamel and dentin following two air-blowing techniques. J Dent 35(1):74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.05.001CrossRefPubMed

41.

Spreafico D, Semeraro S, Mezzanzanica D, Re D, Gagliani M, Tanaka T, Sano H, Sidhu SK (2006) The effect of the air-blowing step on the technique sensitivity of four different adhesive systems. J Dent 34(3):237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.06.004CrossRefPubMed

42.

Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Katoh Y (2006) Effect of air-blowing variables on bond strength of all-in-one adhesives to bovine dentin. Dent Mater J 25(4):664–668. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.25.664CrossRefPubMed

43.

De Munck J, Arita A, Shirai K, Van Landuyt KL, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Microrotary fatigue resistance of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to dentin. J Adhes Dent 9(4):373–379. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a12483CrossRefPubMed

44.

Japiassú Resende Montes MA, de Goes MF, Bernardi da Cunha MR, Borges Soares A (2001) A morphological and tensile bond strength evaluation of an unfilled adhesive with low-viscosity composites and a filled adhesive in one and two coats. J Dent 29(6):435–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00037-9CrossRef

45.

Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Yildiz E, Yücel T, Vanherle G (1996) The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent 9(4):167–173PubMed

46.

Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL (1990) Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 64(6):658–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90291-jCrossRefPubMed

47.

Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2002) Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent 30(2):83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00002-7CrossRefPubMed

48.

Taschner M, Kümmerling M, Lohbauer U, Breschi L, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R (2014) Effect of double-layer application on dentin bond durability of one-step self-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 39(4):416–426. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-168-lCrossRefPubMed

49.

Morresi AL, D’Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D’Arcangelo C, Monaco A (2014) Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 29:295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.09.013CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Does the universal adhesive’s film thickness affect dentin-bonding effectiveness?
verfasst von: Chuliang Tang
Ben Mercelis
Kumiko Yoshihara
Marleen Peumans
Bart Van Meerbeek
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2024
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 2/2024
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05523-7

Update Zahnmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Does the universal adhesive’s film thickness affect dentin-bonding effectiveness?

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Update Zahnmedizin

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2024

Comparative clinical study of phosphorous necrosis and medical-related osteonecrosis of the jaws

Repeated local delivery of hyaluronic acid gel as adjunctive treatment of residual pockets in periodontitis patients undergoing supportive periodontal care. A randomized controlled clinical trial

Autistic individuals have worse oral status than neurotypical controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Do we recognize oral cancer? Primary professional delay in diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma

Biaxial flexural strength of 3D-printed 3Y-TZP zirconia using a novel ceramic printer

Dynamic salivary cytokine profile of recurrent aphthous stomatitis patients in thalidomide maintenance treatment

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Update Zahnmedizin