nach oben

Erschienen in:

Open Access 04.01.2024 | Original Article

Does intervertebral disc degeneration in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correlate with patient-reported pain scores? A review of 968 cases

verfasst von: Conor Boylan, Ravindra Thimmaiah, George McKay, Adrian Gardner, Matthew Newton Ede, Jwalant Mehta, Jonathan Spilsbury, David Marks, Morgan Jones

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 2/2024

Abstract

Purpose

Report the rate and severity of degenerative disc disease (DDD) in non-surgical adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients and correlate these findings with patient-reported symptomatology scores. Additionally, to quantify the rate of concurrent pathological radiological findings in this group.

Methods

This was a retrospective chart review study at a single tertiary centre. AIS patients aged 10–16 who had received a whole spine MRI between September 2007 and January 2019 and who had not received surgical intervention to their spine were included. MRI scan reports were screened to extract those who had evidence of DDD. These were then reviewed by a blinded second reviewer who graded every disc using the Pfirrmann grading system. SRS-22 scores were extracted for patients when available.

Results

In total, 968 participants were included in the study. Of these, 93 (9.6%) had evidence of DDD, which was Pfirrmann grade ≥ 3 in 28 (2.9%). The most commonly affected level was L5/S1 (59.1% of DDD cases).

A total of 55 patients (5.7%) had evidence of syringomyelia, 41 (3.4%) had evidence of spondylolisthesis (all L5/S1), 14 (1.4%) had bilateral L5 pars defects, and 5 (0.5%) had facet joint degeneration. Spondylolisthesis and bilateral pars defects were more common in patients with DDD identified on MRI scan (p < 0.001 and p = 0.04, respectively).

Function (p = 0.048) and pain (p = 0.046) scores were worse in patients with DDD.

Conclusion

We present a baseline for the rate and severity of DDD in the non-operative AIS cohort. This should assist in decision-making and counselling of patients prior to surgery.

Level of evidence

III.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) affects 1–3% of children aged 10–16 years and the natural history includes back pain, deformity, psychosocial problems, and reduction in quality of life [1, 2]. A pathology commonly associated with AIS in both early and late stages is degenerative disc disease (DDD) [3]. This describes both structural damage and accompanying inflammatory changes to the intervertebral discs [4, 5]. DDD may predispose patients to higher rates of chronic lower back pain and disc herniation [4, 6, 7].

A minority of previous studies have attempted to quantify the rate of occult DDD in non-operative or conservatively managed AIS patients, reporting DDD rates ranging from 0 to 11.9% [8‐11]. However, these studies typically review patients specifically selected for MRI, are limited by small sample sizes and heterogenous datasets, and fail to undertake a detailed analysis of disc quality [9‐12]. Furthermore, no previous studies appropriately investigate patient-reported symptoms and how they relate to DDD.

We investigated and reported on the rate and severity of radiologically identified DDD in a non-selected AIS population who have not undergone surgical intervention and investigated the relationships between the presence and severity of DDD with patient-reported symptoms. Second, we quantified the rate of concurrent pathological radiological findings in this group and investigated how the prevalence differs between patients with and without radiological DDD.

Methodology

Participant selection

This was a retrospective study undertaken at a single tertiary centre for spinal deformity surgery, where it is a routine standard of care for all individuals aged 10–16 years with a presumed diagnosis of AIS to undergo an MRI of the whole spine prior to them being seen in clinic. This allows proper characterisation of curve morphology and disc characteristics as well as any concurrent pathological findings in the spine and is thus the gold standard in workup of AIS patients. All scans are reviewed and reported by a fellowship-trained consultant radiologist. From the database of these MRI reports, participants were included for review in this study. All images were taken between September 2007 and January 2019. Images prior to September 2007 were before digital PACS and were not available for review. Exclusion criteria were incomplete demographic data, an incomplete scan report, non-AIS diagnosis or previous spinal surgery. To factor for potential transitional segments, non-functional discs were excluded from analysis.

The term “non-operative patients” is used to describe the participants in our study. This includes patients who had not received surgical intervention at the time of the scan, regardless of whether they later went on to receive surgery or not.

Rate and severity of disc degeneration

From individuals who met the inclusion criteria, MRI reports were examined and information in the presence of DDD, syringomyelia, spondylolisthesis (includes anterolisthesis and retrolisthesis), pars defects, and facet joint degeneration was collected. All MRI images with radiologist-reported DDD were then reviewed by a blinded second reviewer who applied a Pfirrmann grade to every intervertebral disc from C2/3 to L5/S1.

The Pfirrmann grading system is a validated tool for assessing the degree of degeneration of intervertebral discs using an MRI scan. It takes into account the disc structure, height, signal intensity, and the distinction of the nucleus and annulus as separate entities [13]. In keeping with previous studies, grade 3 or higher was considered to indicate significant DDD [14].

MRI scanner parameters

From August 2011 onwards, MR scans were performed on Siemens Skyra 3 Tesla Magnets using a 24-element spine matrix coil. Sagittal T1 (TR/TE 819/11, 3 mm slices with 0.3 mm gap, matrix 448*314) and T2 (TR/TE 3770/104, 3 mm slices with 0.3 mm gap, matrix 512*307) whole spine, coronal T1 (TR/TE 830/9.9, 3 mm slices with 0.6 mm gap, matrix 448*269) T/L spine and axial T2 (TR/TE 4180/114, 4 mm slices with 1 mm gap, matrix 448*269) views were utilised. Unfortunately, MRI scan parameters were unavailable for scans performed prior to this date.

SRS-22 symptomatology scores

Patient-reported outcomes were obtained via a Scoliosis Research Society 22 (SRS-22) questionnaire, where available, for participants included in the study [15]. Where multiple questionnaire results were available, the closest to the time of the MRI scan was used. SRS-22 scores were considered in their five domains: function, pain, self-image, mental health, and management satisfaction. All five domains, as well as the overall score, were used independently and in combination in statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis

Basic data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel for Office 365. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences 26 (SPSS26) software.

Univariable analysis used independent two-tailed Mann–Whitney U tests for continuous data and Fisher exact tests for nominal and ordinal data. Multivariable analysis was performed using simple linear regression with the enter method. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant throughout the study.

Ethical considerations and funding

This study underwent ethical review and obtained approval prior to collection of data (IRAS project ID 279278, Ref 21/PR/0060). As this was a review of previously collected, anonymous, routine care data with no potential for affecting patient care, informed consent was deemed not to be required. An institutional charitable grant was obtained for this study to support administrative costs only.

Results

Participant characteristics

A total of 1086 patients were selected for data analysis, 118 of which were manually excluded following review. Reasons for exclusion and flow of participants are given in Fig. 1. This left 968 patients who met our inclusion criteria. A total of 759 (78.4%) participants were female and the mean age of the entire cohort was 13.9 years (SD 1.5, range 10–16 years). There were 533 (55.1%) participants who had appropriate SRS-22 data collected within 24 months of their MRI scan. The mean time between scan and SRS-22 survey was 4.8 months (SD 5.9 months), with all but 65 surveys being completed within 12 months of MRI. There were 435 (44.9%) participants who did not have suitable SRS-22 data available. There were 47 patients with DDD identified on MRI who did not have appropriate SRS-22 scores recorded.

Disc degeneration and concurrent radiological findings

Disc degenerative disease (DDD) was identified in 93/968 (9.6%) participants. In 28 (2.9%) patients, at least one disc was found to be of Pfirrmann grade ≥ 3. Only 1 disc was graded Pfirrmann 5. The mean age for patients with DDD was 14.2 years and 80.6% were female.

The number of spinal levels affected ranged between 1 and 12, with 46 patients (49.5% of those with DDD) having only single-level disease and 47 patients (50.5% of those with DDD) having disease affecting 2 or more levels. The most commonly affected level was L5/S1 (59.1% of DDD cases), followed by L4/L5 (25.8%) and T11/12 (16.1%). Figure 2 illustrates the distribution of disc degeneration by spinal level. There was no correlation between Cobb angle and severity of disc degeneration (R² = 0.002, F(1,85) = 0.195, p = 0.660, β = − 0.048).

A total of 55 patients (5.7%) had evidence of syringomyelia, 41 (4.2%) had evidence of spondylolisthesis (all L5/S1), 14 (1.4%) had bilateral L5 pars defects, and 5 (0.5%) had facet joint degeneration. Additionally, 3 unilateral L5 pars defects were noted. Both spondylolisthesis (p < 0.001) and bilateral pars defects (p = 0.038) were statistically significantly more common in patients with DDD than those without, as demonstrated in Table 1. Furthermore, of the 41 patients with spondylolisthesis, 5 (12.2%) had at least one disc of Pfirrmann grade ≥ 3. Pfirrmann grades ≥ 3 were statistically significantly more common in patients with spondylolisthesis than those without.

Table 1

Frequency of each concurrent radiological finding compared between patients with and without disc degeneration identified on MRI scan

Concurrent radiological finding	Presence of disc degeneration
Concurrent radiological finding	No disc degeneration (n = 875) N (%)	Disc degeneration (n = 93) N (%)	P-value*
Syringomyelia	52 (5.9)	3 (3.2)	0.353
Spondylolisthesis	29 (3.4)	12 (11.8)	< 0.001
Bilateral pars defect	10 (1.1)	4 (4.3)	0.038
Facet joint degeneration	5 (0.6)	0	1.000

*p-values calculated using Fisher exact test

Statistically significant results are emboldened

Disc degeneration and SRS-22 scores

The mean scores for patients with disc degeneration identified were lower than those without disc degeneration in every domain, as demonstrated in Table 2. Function (U = 9248.0, z = − 1.974, p = 0.048, r = 0.086) and pain (U = 9216.5, z = − 1.993, p = 0.046, r = 0.086) scores differed to a statistically significant degree. There was no statistically significant difference between these cohorts in self-image mental health, management satisfaction, or overall scores.

Table 2

Mean scores in overall and each SRS-22 sub-category compared between patients with and without disc degeneration identified on MRI scan

SRS-22 category	Presence of disc degeneration
SRS-22 category	No disc degeneration (n = 487) Mean (SD)	Disc degeneration (n = 46) Mean (SD)	P-value*
Function	4.0 (0.8)	3.8 (0.6)	0.048
Pain	3.7 (0.9)	3.5 (0.9)	0.046
Self-image	3.2 (0.9)	3.0 (0.9)	0.069
Mental health	3.8 (0.9)	3.7 (0.8)	0.822
Management satisfaction^a	3.7 (1.0)	3.4 (1.0)	0.059
Overall	3.7 (0.7)	3.5 (0.6)	0.073

*p-value calculated using Mann–Whitney U test

^aManagement satisfaction data were not available for all responders (No disc degeneration n = 357, Disc degeneration n = 35). SD, standard deviation

Statistically significant results are emboldened

Discussion

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) has been identified in both early and late stages of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) [16, 17]. Although the precise cause of DDD remains unclear and is currently a subject of active research, prevailing theories suggest a complex interplay between disc "wedging", uneven disc loading, and structural abnormalities as primary and secondary contributing factors [3].

Our study examined the prevalence of DDD in AIS patients who had not undergone surgery. Within this non-operative cohort, 9.6% (93/968) exhibited DDD, with 2.9% (28/968) having Pfirrmann grade 3 or higher disease. Another study, conducted by Ghandhari et al. [8], reported a higher DDD rate of 11.9% in non-operative patients using a different classification method (the J. Khanna method, in which degenerative discs are divided into 3 classes of severity) and a smaller sample size (n = 42). In the broader context, incidental DDD findings on MRI in asymptomatic non-AIS paediatric populations have been reported at 19%, but rates vary between 9 and 25% due to variances in study designs [18‐21].

Among the affected disc levels, L5/S1 was the most common (59.1%), followed by L4/L5 (25.8%). There is a dearth of data on degenerative disc levels in non-operative AIS patients; however, these findings align with studies investigating post-operative DDD occurrence [9, 14, 22, 23]. Notably, Nohara et al. [14] reported a similar rate (40%) of DDD at the L5/S1 junction.

The prevalence of syringomyelia as reported in the literature is highly variable (0.6–5.5%), [12, 24‐26] but our value of 5.7% is consistent with the upper range of this estimate. The frequency of spondylolisthesis in our paper (4.2%) was also consistent with that previously reported by Hershman et al. (4.6%) [27]. However, our rate of bilateral pars defects (1.4%) was lower than that previously found in the literature (3.6%) [28]. Spondylolisthesis and pars defects were more common in patients with DDD, likely due to increased disc loading pressures during normal activities [29]. While some studies have established a connection between facet joint degeneration and DDD, the absence of correlation in our study could potentially be attributed to the time delay between the onset of facet joint disease and progression to disc degeneration, which would not yet have become apparent in this paediatric population [30].

Although the impact of a scoliotic deformity on the prevalence and severity of back pain in AIS remains uncertain, it is acknowledged as a significant problem [31]. In our study, we report a statistically significant correlation (p = 0.046) between the presence of disc degeneration and self-reported pain scores, although the magnitude of the difference is relatively small (r = 0.086). This is in contrast to the prevailing consensus in the literature, which is that DDD has little impact on reported pain in AIS patients. [9, 14, 23, 32, 33] Our novel findings may be related to a comparatively large group size, which is better able to detect relatively small differences in SRS-22 scores.

There is a paucity of published data describing the relationship between the remaining SRS-22 categories (function, self-image, mental health, and management satisfaction) and DDD, so direct comparison with our study is not possible. Green et al. [9] report no significant difference in overall SRS-22 score between patients with Pfirrmann grade I/II and grade III/IV intervertebral discs, which is consistent with our study. We found that overall SRS-22 score did not differ between patients with and without DDD to a statistically significant degree (p = 0.073).

Our study was limited by its retrospective design which meant SRS-22 questionnaires were not collected for all participants, and many were collected some time before or after MRI scans were taken; to ameliorate this, future studies should be prospective in nature. Furthermore, we were not yet able to correlate pre-operative DDD with post-operative outcomes. We also did not assess curve characteristics for all participants included in the study, principally due to the large cohort size and subsequent resource limitations. Lastly, as Pfirrmann grading was performed by one reviewer only it was impossible to assess interobserver reliability, which has been reported as variable in the literature [13, 34].

Conclusion

The rate of DDD in our conservatively managed AIS population is 9.6%, being of Pfirrmann grade ≥ 3 in 2.9%. The most commonly affected disc was L5/S1, which was involved in 59.1% of cases. Rates of spondylolisthesis and bilateral pars defects were significantly higher in patients with radiologically identified DDD. Function and pain scores as reported on SRS-22 questionnaires were statistically significantly worse in patients with DDD, although clinical significance remains to be determined.

While many studies have explored the long-term effects of surgical treatment for AIS on disc health, none prior to this have provided a reliable baseline rate of DDD in non-operative patients. Our study addresses this gap and provides valuable insights into the prevalence and severity of pre-existing DDD in AIS patients, as well as its impact on patient symptomatology. This should assist in decision-making and counselling of patients prior to surgery and should guide future research on the long-term impact of spinal fusion.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

This study underwent ethical review and obtained approval prior to collection of data (IRAS project ID 279278, Ref 21/PR/0060).

All patient information used as part of this study and publication was collected with consent to use for research purposes from the persons in question.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Jetzt e.Med zum Sonderpreis bestellen!

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Jetzt bestellen und 100 € sparen!

Jetzt testen ¹

e.Med Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen der Fachgebiete, den Premium-Inhalten der dazugehörigen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Jetzt testen ²

Weinstein S, Dolan L, Cheng J et al (2008) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 371(9623):1527–1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60658-3CrossRefPubMed

Weinstein S (2019) The natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 39(Supplement 1):S44–S46. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001350CrossRefPubMed

Newton Ede M, Jones S (2016) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evidence for intrinsic factors driving aetiology and progression. Int Orthop 40(10):2075–2080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3132-4CrossRefPubMed

Molinos M, Almeida C, Caldeira J et al (2015) Inflammation in intervertebral disc degeneration and regeneration. J R Soc Interface 12(104):20141191. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.1191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kos N, Gradisnik L, Velnar T (2019) A brief review of the degenerative intervertebral disc disease. Med Arch 73(6):421. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2019.73.421-424CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Buttermann G, Mullin W (2007) Pain and disability correlated with disc degeneration via magnetic resonance imaging in scoliosis patients. Eur Spine J 17(2):240–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0530-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Nv A, Rajasekaran S, KS S, et al (2018) Factors that influence neurological deficit and recovery in lumbar disc prolapse—a narrative review. Int Orthop 43(4):947–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4242-yCrossRefPubMed

Ghandhari H, Ameri E, Nikouei F et al (2018) Long-term outcome of posterior spinal fusion for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-018-0157-zCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Green D, Lawhorne T, Widmann R et al (2011) Long-term magnetic resonance imaging follow-up demonstrates minimal transitional level lumbar disc degeneration after posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 36(23):1948–1954. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ff1ea9CrossRefPubMed

10.

Jones M, Badreddine I, Mehta J et al (2017) The rate of disc degeneration on MRI in preoperative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J 17(11):S332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.10.051CrossRef

11.

Akazawa T, Umehara T, Iinuma M et al (2020) Spinal alignments of residual lumbar curve affect disc degeneration after spinal fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: follow-up after 5 or more years. Spine Surg Relat Res 4(1):50–56. https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2019-0048CrossRefPubMed

12.

Ramirez N, Johnston C, Browne R (1997) The prevalence of back pain in children who have idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 79(3):364–368. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199703000-00007CrossRef

13.

Pfirrmann C, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M et al (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 26(17):1873–1878. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200109010-00011CrossRefPubMed

14.

Nohara A, Kawakami N, Seki K et al (2015) The effects of spinal fusion on lumbar disc degeneration in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a minimum 10-year follow-Up. Spine Deform 3(5):462–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.04.001CrossRefPubMed

15.

Haher T, Gorup J, Shin T et al (1999) Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine 24:1435–1440. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199907150-00008CrossRefPubMed

16.

Kouwenhoven J, Castelein R (2008) The pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 33(26):2898–2908. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181891751CrossRefPubMed

17.

Gervais J, Périé D, Parent S et al (2012) MRI signal distribution within the intervertebral disc as a biomarker of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and spondylolisthesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-239CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Anakwenze O, Kancherla V, Rendon N et al (2011) Adolescent disc dysplasia and back pain. J Child Orthop 5(1):49–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-010-0302-6CrossRefPubMed

19.

Salo S, Paajanen H, Alanen A (1995) Disc degeneration of pediatric patients in lumbar MRI. Pediatr Radiol 25(3):186–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02021530CrossRefPubMed

20.

Tertti M, Salminen J, Paajanen H et al (1991) Low-back pain and disk degeneration in children: a case-control MR imaging study. Radiology 180(2):503–507. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.180.2.1829844CrossRefPubMed

21.

Ramadorai U, Hire J, Brodt E et al (2014) Incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging of the spine in the asymptomatic pediatric population: a systematic review. Evid Based Spine Care J 05(02):095–100. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1386753CrossRef

22.

Akazawa T, Kotani T, Sakuma T et al (2017) Spinal fusion on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with the level of L4 or lower can increase lumbar disc degeneration with sagittal imbalance 35 years after surgery. Spine Surg Relat Res 1(2):72–77. https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.1.2016-0017CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Lonner B, Ren Y, Upasani V et al (2018) Disc degeneration in unfused caudal motion segments ten years following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 6(6):684–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.03.013CrossRefPubMed

24.

Do T, Fras C, Burke S et al (2001) Clinical value of routine preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 83(4):577–579. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200104000-00014CrossRef

25.

Maiocco B, Deeney V, Coulon R et al (1997) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and the presence of spinal cord abnormalities. Spine 22(21):2537–2541. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199711010-00014CrossRefPubMed

26.

Dewan V, Gardner A, Forster S et al (2008) Is the routine use of magnetic resonance imaging indicated in patients with scoliosis? J Spine Surg 4(3):575–582. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2018.07.01CrossRef

27.

Hershman S, Hochfelder J, Dean L et al (2013) Spondylolisthesis in operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: prevalence and results of surgical intervention. Spine Deform 1(4):280–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2013.05.003CrossRefPubMed

28.

Mukhopadhyay S, Batra S, Kamath S et al (2011) Incidence of pars defects in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an MRI study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 45:209–214. https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2011.2555CrossRefPubMed

29.

Tenny S, Gillis C (2021) Spondylolisthesis. [Updated 2021 May 29]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing 2021, Treasure Island (FL). Jan Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430767/

30.

Perolat R, Kastler A, Nicot B et al (2018) Facet joint syndrome: from diagnosis to interventional management. Insights Imaging 9(5):773–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0638-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Balagué F, Pellisé F (2016) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and back pain. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-016-0086-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Danielsson A, Cederlund C, Ekholm S et al (2001) The prevalence of disc aging and back pain after fusion extending into the lower lumbar spine. A matched MR study twenty-five years after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Radiol 42(2):187–197PubMed

33.

Akazawa T, Minami S, Kotani T et al (2012) Long-term clinical outcomes of surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 21 to 41 years later. Spine 37(5):402–405. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823d2b06CrossRefPubMed

34.

Rim D (2016) Quantitative Pfirrmann disc degeneration grading system to overcome the limitation of Pfirrmann disc degeneration grade. Korean J Spine 13(1):1. https://doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2016.13.1.1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Does intervertebral disc degeneration in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correlate with patient-reported pain scores? A review of 968 cases
verfasst von: Conor Boylan
Ravindra Thimmaiah
George McKay
Adrian Gardner
Matthew Newton Ede
Jwalant Mehta
Jonathan Spilsbury
David Marks
Morgan Jones
Publikationsdatum: 04.01.2024
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 2/2024
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-08082-9

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

29.05.2024 Periprothetische Infektionen Nachrichten

Zur Zementierung einer Knie-TEP wird in Deutschland zu über 98% Knochenzement verwendet, der mit einem Antibiotikum beladen ist. Ob er wirklich besser ist als Zement ohne Antibiotikum, kann laut Registerdaten bezweifelt werden.

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Does intervertebral disc degeneration in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correlate with patient-reported pain scores? A review of 968 cases