nach oben

European Spine Journal

Erschienen in:

22.09.2023 | Original Article

Development and temporal validation of clinical prediction models for 1-year disability and pain after lumbar decompressive surgery. The Norwich Lumbar Surgery Predictor (development version)

verfasst von: Jonathan H. Geere, Paul R. Hunter, Girish N. Swamy, Andrew J. Cook, Amarjit S. Rai

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 12/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To identify clinical predictors and build prediction models for 1-year patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) after lumbar decompressive surgery for disc herniation or spinal stenosis.

Methods

The study included 1835 cases, with or without additional single-level fusion, from a single centre from 2008 through 2020. General linear models imputed with 37 clinical variables identified 18 significant 1-year PROM predictors for retention in development models. Interaction of surgical indication with each predictor was tested. Temporal validation was conducted at the same centre on cases through 2021. R² was used to measure goodness-of-fit, and area under curve (AUC) used to measure classification to a satisfactory symptom state (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) ≤ 22; back or leg pain ≤ 30 out of 100).

Results

A total 1228 (67%) had complete data for inclusion in model development. Predictors of ODI were baseline PROMs (ODI, back pain, leg pain), work status, condition duration, previous lumbar operation, multiple-joint osteoarthritis, female, diabetes, current smoker, rheumatic disorder, lower limb arthroplasty, mobility aided, provider status, facet cyst, scoliosis, and age, with BMI significantly associated with stenosis. Temporal validation (n = 188) found the ODI model R² was 0.29 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.18–0.40) and AUC was 0.74 (95% CI 0.67–0.81). Back and leg pain models had lower R² (0.12–0.14) and AUC (0.68–0.69) values.

Conclusion

Important PROM predictors are baseline PROMs, specific co-morbidities, work status, condition duration, previous lumbar operation, female, and smoking status. The ODI model predicted the likelihood of achieving a satisfactory state of both disability and pain.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Karhade AV, Fogel HA, Cha TD, Hershman SH, Doorly TP, Kang JD, Bono CM, Harris MB, Schwab JH, Tobert DG (2021) Development of prediction models for clinically meaningful improvement in PROMIS scores after lumbar decompression. Spine J 21:397–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.10.026CrossRefPubMed

Khor S, Lavallee D, Cizik AM, Bellabarba C, Chapman JR, Howe CR, Lu D, Mohit AA, Oskouian RJ, Roh JR, Shonnard N, Dagal A, Flum DR (2018) Development and validation of a prediction model for pain and functional outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. JAMA Surg 153:634–642. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0072CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cushnie D, Thomas K, Jacobs WB, Cho RKH, Soroceanu A, Ahn H, Attabib N, Bailey CS, Fisher CG, Glennie RA, Hall H, Jarzem P, Johnson MG, Manson NA, Nataraj A, Paquet J, Rampersaud YR, Phan P, Casha S (2019) Effect of preoperative symptom duration on outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a Canadian spine outcomes and research network registry study. Spine J 19:1470–1477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.05.008CrossRefPubMed

Aaen J, Banitalebi H, Austevoll IM, Hellum C, Storheim K, Myklebust T, Anvar M, Weber C, Solberg T, Grundnes O, Brisby H, Indrekvam K, Hermansen E (2022) The association between preoperative MRI findings and clinical improvement in patients included in the NORDSTEN spinal stenosis trial. Eur Spine J 31:2777–2785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07317-5CrossRefPubMed

Clement RC, Welander A, Stowell C, Cha TD, Chen JL, Davies M, Fairbank JC, Foley KT, Gehrchen M, Hagg O, Jacobs WC, Kahler R, Khan SN, Lieberman IH, Morisson B, Ohnmeiss DD, Peul WC, Shonnard NH, Smuck MW, Solberg TK, Stromqvist BH, Hooff MLV, Wasan AD, Willems PC, Yeo W, Fritzell P (2015) A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain. Acta Orthop 86:523–533. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1036696CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Aalto TJ, Malmivaara A, Kovacs F, Herno A, Alen M, Salmi L, Krger H, Andrade J, Jimnez R, Tapaninaho A, Turunen V, Savolainen S, Airaksinen O (2006) Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review. Spine 31:E648–E663. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000231727.88477.daCrossRefPubMed

Iderberg H, Willers C, Borgstrom F, Hedlund R, Hagg O, Moller H, Ornstein E, Sanden B, Stalberg H, Torevall-Larsson H, Tullberg T, Fritzell P (2019) Predicting clinical outcome and length of sick leave after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in Sweden: a multi-register evaluation. Eur Spine J 28:1423–1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5842-3CrossRefPubMed

Perruccio AV, Power JD, Yip C, Badley EM, Canizares M, Rampersaud YR (2021) The impact of multijoint symptoms on patient-reported disability following surgery for lumbar spine osteoarthritis. Spine J 21:80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.08.005CrossRefPubMed

St-Pierre GH, Yang MH, Bourget-Murray J, Thomas KC, Hurlbert RJ, Matthes N (2018) Performance Indicators in Spine Surgery. Spine 43:275–280. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002309CrossRefPubMed

10.

Staub LP, Aghayev E, Skrivankova V, Lord SJ, Haschtmann D, Mannion AF (2020) Development and temporal validation of a prognostic model for 1-year clinical outcome after decompression surgery for lumbar disc herniation. Eur Spine J 29:1742–1751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06351-5CrossRefPubMed

11.

van Hooff ML, Mannion AF, Staub LP, Ostelo RWJG, Fairbank JCT (2016) Determination of the oswestry disability index score equivalent to a “satisfactory symptom state” in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine—a Spine Tango registry-based study. Spine J 16:1221–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.06.010CrossRefPubMed

12.

Fekete TF, Haschtmann D, Kleinstück FS, Porchet F, Jeszenszky D, Mannion AF (2016) What level of pain are patients happy to live with after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders? Spine J 16:S12–S18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.01.180CrossRefPubMed

13.

Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG (2015) Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ 350:g7594. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7594CrossRefPubMed

14.

Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The oswestry disability index. Spine 25:2940–2953. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017CrossRefPubMed

15.

Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX (2013) Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New YorkCrossRef

16.

Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PM (2003) The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 56:1129–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00177-xCrossRefPubMed

17.

Rushton A, Zoulas K, Powell A, Staal JB (2018) Physical prognostic factors predicting outcome following lumbar discectomy surgery: systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2240-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Gulati S, Nordseth T, Nerland US, Gulati M, Weber C, Giannadakis C, Nygaard ØP, Solberg TK, Solheim O, Jakola AS (2015) Does daily tobacco smoking affect outcomes after microdecompression for degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis?—a multicenter observational registry-based study. Acta Neurochir 157:1157–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-015-2437-1CrossRefPubMed

19.

Wilson CA, Roffey DM, Chow D, Alkherayf F, Wai EK (2016) A systematic review of preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcomes following lumbar discectomy. Spine J 16:1413–1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.08.003CrossRefPubMed

20.

Schoenfeld AJ, Bono CM (2015) Does surgical timing influence functional recovery after lumbar discectomy? a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:1963–1970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3505-1CrossRefPubMed

21.

Gullo TR, Golightly YM, Cleveland RJ, Renner JB, Callahan LF, Jordan JM, Kraus VB, Nelson AE (2019) Defining multiple joint osteoarthritis, its frequency and impact in a community-based cohort. Semin Arthritis Rheum 48:950–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.10.001CrossRefPubMed

22.

Armaghani SJ, Archer KR, Rolfe RC, Demaio DN, Devin CJ (2016) Diabetes is related to worse patient-reported outcomes at two years following spine surgery. JBJS 98:15–22. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.O.00297CrossRef

23.

McKillop AB, Carroll LJ, Battie MC (2014) Depression as a prognostic factor of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review. Spine J 14:837–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.052CrossRefPubMed

24.

MacLean MA, Touchette CJ, Han JH, Christie SD, Pickett GE (2020) Gender differences in the surgical management of lumbar degenerative disease: a scoping review. J Neurosurg Spine 31:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.11.SPINE19896CrossRef

25.

Rundell SD, Pennings JS, Nian H, Harrell FE, Khan I, Bydon M, Asher AL, Devin CJ, Archer KR (2020) Adding 3-month patient data improves prognostic models of 12-month disability, pain, and satisfaction after specific lumbar spine surgical procedures: development and validation of a prediction model. Spine J 20:600–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.12.010CrossRefPubMed

26.

Zakaria HM, Mansour TR, Telemi E, Asmaro K, Bazydlo M, Schultz L, Nerenz DR, Abdulhak M, Khalil JG, Easton R, Schwalb JM, Park P, Chang V (2020) The association of preoperative opioid usage with patient-reported outcomes, adverse events, and return to work after lumbar fusion: analysis from the michigan spine surgery improvement collaborative (MSSIC). Neurosurgery 87:142–149. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz423CrossRefPubMed

27.

Shamji MF, Shcharinsky A (2016) Use of neuropathic pain questionnaires in predicting persistent postoperative neuropathic pain following lumbar discectomy for radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 24:256–262. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.4.Spine141310CrossRefPubMed

28.

Quddusi A, Eversdijk HAJ, Klukowska AM, de Wispelaere MP, Kernbach JM, Schröder ML, Staartjes VE (2020) External validation of a prediction model for pain and functional outcome after elective lumbar spinal fusion. Eur Spine J 29:374–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06189-6CrossRefPubMed

29.

Siccoli A, de Wispelaere MP, Schröder ML, Staartjes VE (2019) Machine learning-based preoperative predictive analytics for lumbar spinal stenosis. Neurosurg Focus 46:E5. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.2.Focus18723CrossRefPubMed

30.

Asher AM, Oleisky ER, Pennings JS, Khan I, Sivaganesan A, Devin CJ, Bydon M, Asher AL, Archer KR (2020) Measuring clinically relevant improvement after lumbar spine surgery: is it time for something new? Spine J 20:847–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.01.010CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Development and temporal validation of clinical prediction models for 1-year disability and pain after lumbar decompressive surgery. The Norwich Lumbar Surgery Predictor (development version)
verfasst von: Jonathan H. Geere
Paul R. Hunter
Girish N. Swamy
Andrew J. Cook
Amarjit S. Rai
Publikationsdatum: 22.09.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 12/2023
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07931-x

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

29.05.2024 Periprothetische Infektionen Nachrichten

Zur Zementierung einer Knie-TEP wird in Deutschland zu über 98% Knochenzement verwendet, der mit einem Antibiotikum beladen ist. Ob er wirklich besser ist als Zement ohne Antibiotikum, kann laut Registerdaten bezweifelt werden.

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Development and temporal validation of clinical prediction models for 1-year disability and pain after lumbar decompressive surgery. The Norwich Lumbar Surgery Predictor (development version)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2023

Answer to the Letter to the Editor of V. Kumar, et al. concerning “The contribution of preoperative balanced halo-pelvic traction to severe rigid spinal deformity correction” by Z. Zhou et al. (Eur Spine J [2023]; doi: 10/1007/s00586-023-07916-w)

Kyphectomy in myelomeningocele revisited: risk factors for failure

Mobile technologies for rehabilitation in non-specific spinal disorders: a systematic review of the efficacy and potential for implementation in low- and middle-income countries

Low back pain improvement after cervical laminoplasty in patients without tandem lumbar stenosis

Letter to the Editor concerning “The contribution of preoperative balanced halo-pelvic traction to severe rigid spinal deformity correction” by Z. Zhou et al. (Eur Spine J [2023]; doi: 10/1007/s00586-023–07916-w)

Postural adaptations within normalized stability between older adults with and without chronic low back pain

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie