Dear editor,
We read with great interest the article by Nakamura et al. [1] discussing the use of belt-type electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) for early rehabilitation in severe COVID-19. Authors suggested that among the various possibilities of EMS (i.e., application of a series of stimuli to skeletal muscle to trigger muscle contractions), belt-type EMS could be effective for critical care because it can induce whole lower extremity exercise. Such exercise could be of great interest in the early acute phase in order to counteract Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Weakness (ICUAW). Indeed, although knowledge of COVID-19 per se is still incomplete, it is reasonable to assume, based on what we know from other severe respiratory syndromes, that COVID-19 patients may present ICUAW-associated consequences, such as physical, mental, and cognitive dysfunctions [2].
Anzeige
For these reasons, rehabilitation appears as a key component of these patients’ care. More specifically, international experts highlighted that early rehabilitation (with active involvement by a physiotherapist) can drastically improve activities of daily living, exercise function, length of hospital stay, and mechanical ventilation [2] and would likely play a major role in promoting a functional return to home for the patients [3].
Although the method presented by Nakamura et al. [1] is interesting, it is essential that early rehabilitation following COVID-19 also targets cardiovascular, cognitive, functional, and mobility reconditioning [2]. Such benefits require exercise intensities that might not be reachable with belt-type EMS. On the contrary, we think that FES-cycling (coordinated stimulation of lower limbs’ muscles to produce the movement of cycling on an ergometer placed on the patients’ bed) could be a solution since it involves a great muscle mass during a functional movement [4]. This method has already shown very beneficial effects in populations of patients with no or poor possibilities of lower-limb exercise [4, 5], and similar benefits can be expected in patients hospitalized in ICU for COVID-19.
Therefore, although we truly think that the method described by Nakamura et al. [1] might be of great interest, we suggest that the use of FES-cycling would induce greater benefits both at short and long term. Sharing this protocol might allow to establish if FES-cycling has a role to play regarding the burden induced by ICUAW in COVID-19 patients. This represents an important challenge for the patients, healthcare providers, and the societies worldwide.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Anzeige
Availability of data materials
Not applicable.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.