nach oben

Erschienen in:

16.08.2023 | Review Article

Complications in endoscopic spine surgery: a systematic review

verfasst von: Domenico Compagnone, Filippo Mandelli, Matteo Ponzo, Francesco Langella, Riccardo Cecchinato, Marco Damilano, Andrea Redaelli, Giuseppe Maria Peretti, Daniele Vanni, Pedro Berjano

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 2/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This systematic review aims to investigate the complication rate of endoscopic spine surgeries, stratifying them by technique, district and kind of procedure performed.

Methods

This study was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. The literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Register, OTseeker and ScienceDirect database. Types of studies included were observational studies (cohort studies, case–control studies and case series) and randomised or quasi-randomised clinical with human subjects. No restrictions on publication year were applied. Repeated articles, reviews, expert's comments, congress abstracts, technical notes and articles not in English were excluded. Several data were extracted from the articles. In particular, data of perioperative (≤ 3 months) and late (> 3 months) complications were collected and grouped according to: (1) surgical technique [uniportal full-endoscopic spine surgery (UESS) or unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery (UBESS)]; (2) spinal district treated [cervical, thoracic or lumbar] and (3) type of procedure [discectomy/decompression or fusion]. Complication analysis was performed in subgroups with at least 100 patients to have clinically meaningful statistical validity.

Results

A total of 117 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Of the 117 records included, 95 focused their research on UESS (14 LOE V, 33 LOE IV, 43 LOE III and five LOE II) and 23 on UBESS (three LOE V, eight LOE IV, 10 LOE III and two LOE II). A total of 20,020 patients were extracted to investigate the incidence of different perioperative and late complications, 10,405 for UESS and 9615 for UBESS.

Conclusion

The present study summarises the complications reported in the literature for spinal endoscopic procedures. On the one hand, the most relevant described were perioperative complications (transient neurological deficit, dural tear and dysesthesia) that are especially meaningful for endoscopic discectomy and decompression. On the other hand, late complications, such as mechanical implant failure, are more common in endoscopic interbody fusion.

Level of Evidence

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Kim HS, Wu PH, Jang IT (2020) Current and future of endoscopic spine surgery: what are the common procedures we have now and what lies ahead? World Neurosurg 140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.111

Li WS, Yan Q, Cong L (2022) Comparison of endoscopic discectomy versus non-endoscopic discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob Spine J, 12

Kim SK, Kang SS, Hong YH et al (2018) Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic technique versus open microdiscectomy for single-level lumbar discectomy: a multicenter, retrospective analysis. J Orthop Surg Res, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0725-1

Payer M (2011) “Minimally invasive” lumbar spine surgery: a critical review. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 153

Kambin P (2006) Arthroscopic and endoscopic spine surgery via a posterolateral approach. In: Minimally invasive spine surgery, 2nd edn. A surgical m**anual

Kambin P (1992) Arthroscopic microdiscectomy. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-8063(92)90058-J

Hoogland T, Schubert M, Miklitz B, Ramirez A (2006) Transforaminal posterolateral endoscopic discectomy with or without the combination of a low-dose chymopapain: a prospective randomized study in 280 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 31. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000245955.22358.3a

Yeung AT, Yeung CA (2003) Advances in endoscopic disc and spine surgery: foraminal approach. Surg Technol Int, 11

Ruetten S, Komp M, Godolias G (2006) A new full-endoscopic technique for the interlaminar operation of lumbar disc herniations using 6-mm endoscopes: prospective 2-year results of 331 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg, 49. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-932172

10.

Telfeian AE, Veeravagu A, Oyelese AA, Gokaslan ZL (2016) A brief history of endoscopic spine surgery. Neurosurg Focus, 40. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.11.FOCUS15429

11.

Ahn Y, Lee SH (2010) Outcome predictors of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and thermal annuloplasty for discogenic low back pain. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0726-2

12.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372

13.

Glassman SD, Hamill CL, Bridwell KH et al (2007) The impact of perioperative complications on clinical outcome in adult deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2764–2770. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a7644CrossRefPubMed

14.

Sciubba DM, Yurter A, Smith JS et al (2015) A comprehensive review of complication rates after surgery for adult deformity: a reference for informed consent. Spine Deform 3:575–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.04.005CrossRefPubMed

15.

Zanirato A, Damilano M, Formica M et al (2018) Complications in adult spine deformity surgery: a systematic review of the recent literature with reporting of aggregated incidences. Eur Spine J 27:2272–2284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5535-yCrossRefPubMed

16.

Fan G, Han R, Gu X et al (2017) Navigation improves the learning curve of transforamimal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Int Orthop 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3281-5

17.

Chen G, Wang X, Nie H et al (2018) Negative pressure pulmonary edema after percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy-a case report. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2306-1

18.

Shu W, Wang H, Zhu H et al (2020) Nerve root entrapment with pseudomeningocele after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a case report. J Spinal Cord Med, 43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2018.1507802

19.

Ahn Y, Jin UK, Byung HL et al (2009) Postoperative retroperitoneal hematoma following transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.2.SPINE08227

20.

Wang Y, Ai P, Zhan G, Shen B (2018) Lumbar artery injury during transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: successful treatment by emergent transcatheter arterial embolization. Ann Vasc Surg 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2018.05.032

21.

Heo DH, Lee DC, Kim HS et al (2021) Clinical results and complications of endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis. World Neurosurg, 145

22.

Wasinpongwanich K, Pongpirul K, Lwin KMM et al (2019) Full-endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy: retrospective review of clinical results and complications in 545 international patients. World Neurosurg, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.101

23.

Yu P, Zan P, Zhang X et al (2021) Comparison of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and microendoscopic discectomy for the surgical management of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: A multicenter retrospective cohort study with a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. Pain Phys, 24. https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2021.24.e117-e125

24.

Chen Z, Zhang L, Dong J, et al (2020) Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: two-year results of a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 45. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003314

25.

Lee C-W, Yoon K-J, Jun J-H (2018) Percutaneous endoscopic laminotomy with flavectomy by uniportal, unilateral approach for the lumbar canal or lateral recess stenosis. World Neurosurg 113:e129–e137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.195CrossRefPubMed

26.

Choi G, Modi HN, Prada N et al (2013) Clinical results of XMR-assisted percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy. J Orthop Surg Res 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-8-14

27.

Zhou C, Zhang G, Panchal RR et al (2018) Unique complications of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy. Pain Phys, 21

28.

Soliman HM (2015) Irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy. A new endoscopic approach for spinal stenosis decompression. Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.009

29.

Sun B, Shi C, Xu Z et al (2019) Learning curve for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar diskectomy in bi-needle technique using cumulative summation test for learning curve. World Neurosurg 129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.227

30.

Park SM, Kim HJ, Kim GU et al (2019) Learning curve for lumbar decompressive laminectomy in biportal endoscopic spinal surgery using the cumulative summation test for learning curve. World Neurosurg 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.197

31.

Jacquot F, Gastambide D (2013) Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Is it worth it? Int Orthop 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1905-6

32.

Jin M, Zhang J, Shao H et al (2020) Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a consecutive case series with mean 2-year follow-up. Pain Phys, 23. https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2020/23/165

33.

Kolcun JPG, Brusko GD, Basil GW et al (2019) Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Neurosurg Focus 46:E14. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.12.FOCUS18701CrossRefPubMed

34.

Choi DJ, Choi CM, Jung JT et al (2016) Learning curve associated with complications in biportal endoscopic spinal surgery: challenges and strategies. Asian Spine J 10. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.4.624

35.

Yang J, Liu C, Hai Y et al (2019) Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: preliminary report of seven cases with 12-month follow-up. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3091459

36.

Kim JE, Yoo HS, Choi DJ et al (2021) Comparison of minimal invasive versus biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar disease. Clin Spine Surg 34. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001024

37.

Kim JE, Yoo HS, Choi DJ et al (2020) Learning curve and clinical outcome of biportal endoscopic-assisted lumbar interbody fusion. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8815432

Titel: Complications in endoscopic spine surgery: a systematic review
verfasst von: Domenico Compagnone
Filippo Mandelli
Matteo Ponzo
Francesco Langella
Riccardo Cecchinato
Marco Damilano
Andrea Redaelli
Giuseppe Maria Peretti
Daniele Vanni
Pedro Berjano
Publikationsdatum: 16.08.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 2/2024
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07891-2

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

29.05.2024 Periprothetische Infektionen Nachrichten

Zur Zementierung einer Knie-TEP wird in Deutschland zu über 98% Knochenzement verwendet, der mit einem Antibiotikum beladen ist. Ob er wirklich besser ist als Zement ohne Antibiotikum, kann laut Registerdaten bezweifelt werden.

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Complications in endoscopic spine surgery: a systematic review