Anzeige
Erschienen in:
18.03.2023 | Orthopaedic Surgery
Comparison of segmental lordosis gain of prone transpsoas (PTP) vs. lateral lumbar interbody fusion
Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Ausgabe 9/2023
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Introduction
Lumbar interbody fusion is a standard method to treat certain degenerative conditions that are refractory to conservative treatments. LLIF reduces posterior muscle damage, can relieve neurological symptoms through indirect decompression, provides increased stability with its wider cages, and promotes more significant segmental lordosis than standard posterior techniques. However, the technique possesses its issues, such as unusual positioning, possible plexus-related symptoms, and median segmental lordosis correction. Trying to ease those issues, the idea of a prone transpsoas technique occurred.
Methods
Retrospective, single-centric, comparative, and non-randomized study. The authors paired patients receiving lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) or prone transpsoas (PTP) to evaluate the technique’s impact on the segmental lordosis correction. A correlation test selected the covariates for the matching. p-Values inferior to 0.05 were deemed significant.
Results
Seventy-one patients were included in the analysis, 53 in the LLIF group and 18 in the PTP group. The significant covariates to the segmental lordosis correction were technique, preoperative segmental lordosis, cage position, and preoperative pelvic tilt. After the paring model, PTP showed significant segmental lordosis correction potential regarding the LLIF.
Conclusion
The prone transpsoas approach can significantly enhance the correction of segmental lordosis proportionated to the traditional LLIF approach.