Anzeige
Erschienen in:
22.02.2021 | Original Article
A Meta-analysis of Complication Rates Among Various Surgical Modifications of Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flap
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | Sonderheft 3/2022
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
The purpose of this study is to aggregate and summarize the complication rates among various modified techniques of pectoralis major myocutaneous flap harvesting. Various databases were searched from its inception to September 2020. Studies describing surgical management of head and neck oncologic reconstruction using pectoralis major myocutaneous flap and its surgical modifications were included in study. All included studies: (1) described a pectoralis major flap harvesting technique categorized by author as conventional technique, bipaddle or bilobed flap, segmental flap, flap transfer using subclavicular route, skin paddle over Pectoralis Major, Flap with Multiple vascular supply, U shaped skin paddle, modified short incision technique; and (2) reported the number of postoperative complications in participants. Meta-analysis was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A total 183 studies were included. Segmental flap (0.20%), flap with multiple vascular supply (5.18%) and parasternal skin flap (6.38%) had the highest rates of total complications and were the only techniques to show a statistically significant increase in odds ratio compared with conventional technique (odds ratio 1.89, 9.05 and 7.26, respectively, P < 0.05). Bipaddle flap (57.48%) and u shaped skin flap (78.05%) show statistically significant decrease in odds ratio as compared to conventional technique. Among all the modifications in surgical technique of pectoralis major myocutaneous flap harvesting bipaddle flap and u shaped skin flap show least total complication rates. But on the contrary rates of partial flap necrosis and fistula are significantly higher in bipaddle flap as compared to conventional technique. As such, the choice of surgical technique should primarily be made based on the defect size, patient selection and surgeons’ discretion rather than the presumed complication rate.